Agenda item

To support its strategic investment objective the Fund has set climate targets that require regular monitoring so we can evaluate progress and to develop our climate policy as improved data emerges and new investment solutions are developed. The Fund monitors its progress against its net zero targets annually.

The Investments Manager introduced the report to the Panel and highlighted the following points.

The Fund has four decarbonisation and transition alignment targets that support the ambition to achieve Net Zero by 2045. Progress against each is summarised as follows:

1.

·  Listed equities - target 43% emissions reduction by 2025 and 69% by 2030 (versus 2020 baseline)

·  Ahead of 2025 target with 60% reduction, need another 22% reduction from here to reach 2030 target. Progress will rely more heavily on underlying company decarbonisation than asset allocation.

2.

·  Corporate Bonds - target 60% emissions reduction by 2030 (versus 2020 baseline)

·  Ahead of target pathway as achieved 47% reduction so far. Require a further 24% in carbon footprint to reach 2030 target reduction.

3.

·  Ensure 70% of financed emissions in material sectors are subject to engagement and stewardship actions for all listed equities by end 2024 and 90% by June 2027

·  On track - 87% of material sectors’ financed emissions are aligned or subject to active engagement.

4.

·  By 2030 we will divest from developed equity holdings in high impact sectors that are not achieving NZ or not aligning to achieve NZ by 2050

·  No action taken to date. 88% of financed emissions within the listed equity portfolio are aligned or subject to active engagement (up from 76% last year). Companies not aligned will be captured under the Fund’s 2030 divestment commitment.

Transition alignment of the underlying assets is also measured by Mercer shows the exposure to assets that are ‘well aligned’, those that have ‘transition capacity’ (not aligned as yet but can align) and those that are ‘not well aligned’ (and probably will find it difficult to align). The Fund has a low exposure to the ‘not well aligned’ category and a high allocation to the well aligned (particularly across the equity portfolios). The focus of engagement to achieve real world impact must be on our exposure to the most carbon intensive transition capacity assets.

Hill Gaston, Mercer addressed the Panel and highlighted the following points from within the Net Zero Monitoring 2023 Update.

Progress to date

·  2021 – Set targets: Total Fund 2050 net zero target

·  Adopted listed equity portfolio carbon reduction targets of 43% by 2025 and 69% by 2030, versus 2020 baseline position

·  2022-23 - Revised target: Total Fund 2045 net zero target

·  Monitor progress vs. 2025 and 2030 decarbonisation targets

·  Investment Manager decisions - Helped inform decision to switch from Brunel Emerging Market Fund to Brunel Global High Alpha Equity and Global Sustainable Equity Funds

·  Stewardship & Engagement - Identified most strategically important companies to engage with from a climate perspective.

o  Engagement and divestment targets adopted for listed equity.

·  Today - Monitor Progress vs. 2025 and 2030 decarbonisation targets: On track

·  Strengthening targets - Recommendation to:

o  Engage with Brunel on most intensive companies not already under engagement by CA100+ or Brunel.

o  Engage with Brunel on initial private market metrics and timeline for fuller disclosures. Explore adopting Brunel private market targets following this exercise.

·  2024 and beyond

·  Listed Equity / Corporate Bonds - Evolve approach to engagement and alignment targets.

·  Scope 3 - Introduce targets when data quality / availability allows

·  Private markets - Continue monitoring and consider net zero targets (where feasible)

·  New investments - Implement allocations to biodiversity / natural capital

Pauline Gordon asked if it could be explained what BlackRock does in its work with the Government in terms of their assets and gilts as gilts are not ‘green’ and it’s difficult to engage with governments.

Hill Gaston replied that a lot of their investment is in Government bonds and feedback from investors is then supplied to the Debt Management Office. He added that the Government has also set its own net zero targets.

Pauline Gordon asked if he was aware of any schemes lobbying Government in relation to the PLSA (Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association).

Hill Gaston replied that there are a number of different working groups, some setup by the Government, that will push for the need to have transition plans. He added that he was also aware of the National Wealth Fund that could look at investing in climate opportunities within the UK.

Three Elements of Net Zero

·  Portfolio constructed from companies / assets aligned with a low carbon transition

·  Investment in climate solutions that support economy wide decarbonisation

·  Front-loaded portfolio decarbonisation with a focus on managing transition risk

Summary of progress

·  Listed equity carbon footprint has fallen 60.0% over 2020-2024 and is ahead of the targeted decarbonisation pathway

·  Corporate Bonds carbon footprint has fallen by 47.7% over 2020-2024 and is ahead of the targeted decarbonisation pathway

·  Low allocations to grey assets, concentrated primarily in the Brunel MAC and Global High Alpha mandates. Positive progress in the Brunel Developed Paris Aligned mandate, which has almost eliminated exposure to grey assets.

·  Private markets: The Fund has made commitments to Schroders Greencoat, Brunel Renewable Infrastructure and Secured Income Funds. We note the Octopus Affordable Housing Fund has a strong net zero focus and the Fund is exploring natural capital allocations.

Councillor Paul Crossley asked what analysis is undertaken when deciding which new companies to invest in.

Hill Gaston replied that a normal starting position would be to assess what sectors need to decarbonise. He added that the risk element then needs to be assessed before investing in mainly proven and reliable technologies. He said that new areas of investment involving hydrogen and nature based solutions were areas to consider.

The Group Manager for Funding, Investment & Risk said that it is difficult for Fund Managers to make decisions around new and emerging technologies as the rate of technology changes so rapidly and only some will become commercially successful.

Pauline Gordon asked if following the Fund’s decision to withdraw from the Brunel Emerging Market Fund was there any indication that their climate metrics had improved.

The Group Manager for Funding, Investment & Risk said that it was also the inability to engage as well as other financial factors that had led to this decision.

Hill Gaston said that they still obviously have a critical role to play, but are slightly behind where they need to be.

Steve Turner commented that China (30% of the index) have a net zero target of 2060 and India (15% of the index) have a net zero target of 2070.

Climate Solutions

·  The Fund has allocations to climate solutions across its portfolio including:

o  Within the listed equity portfolio (e.g. Paris Aligned Equities, Sustainable Equity).

o  Exposure to renewable infrastructure, including the Schroders Greencoat Wessex Gardens commitment and the Brunel Renewable Infrastructure and Secured Income Funds. This exposure constitutes 9-10% of total Fund assets.

o  Octopus Affordable Housing Fund has a strong net zero focus.

·  The Fund has also agreed to invest in Natural Capital, with work ongoing to determine the size and make-up of this allocation.

Summary

·  Good progress to date; the Fund’s listed equity and corporate bond portfolios are ahead of decarbonisation targets

·  Good progress on alignment and climate solutions

·  Too early to set net zero targets for private markets

·  Look to agree approach to natural capital allocation and implementation plan

·  Integrate nature risk assessment into approach

The Group Manager for Funding, Investment & Risk said that the Responsible Investment report would be debated by the Committee later in the month. She stated that it was important to have a good evidence base and that Brunel were also due to provide details of how they will engage with their top 10 emitters.

Jackie Peel referred to slide 17 of the appendix and asked if a reason could be given as to why the figures for Multi Asset Credit – Carbon Footprint had deteriorated.

Hill Gaston replied that there were no formal targets in place, in terms of Muli Asset Credit (MAC) and that he was not sure of reason behind these figures. He added that it was showing better figures under the WACI and said that often it could be a single holding that could be making the difference.

Pauline Gordon asked if consideration was being given to moving to the M&G Multi Asset Credit ‘Sustainable version’.

The Group Manager for Funding, Investment & Risk replied that when Brunel appoint their managers they are always pushing from an ESG perspective. She added that further development is required across the credit markets.

Steve Turner added that privately owned businesses are not compelled to collect climate data.

Councillor Paul Crossley asked if any pressure could be applied from the LGPS regarding private companies.

Steve Turner replied that lobbying the Government could be one course of action to take. He added though that the majority of MAC is dominated by companies within the USA.

The Panel RESOLVED to note the Net Zero analysis and progress report.