Issue - meetings
Public Realm and Highway Improvement Scheme for High Street/Northumberland Place: Options for Orange Grove/Terrace Walk
Meeting: 09/11/2011 - Cabinet (Item 97)
Cabinet will be asked to select their preferred option for Orange Grove/Terrace Walk, to form basis of subsequent TRO process and to delegate authority for the development and delivery of the High St/Northumberland Place scheme to Strategic Director of Development and Major Projects, in consultation with Cabinet Member Sustainable Development.
:
Additional documents:
- Appx 1 Orange Grove Pros And Cons, item 97 PDF 24 KB
- Appx 2 Technical Assessment Alt Layout, item 97 PDF 993 KB
- Appx 3 Key Objectives, item 97 PDF 18 KB
- Appx 4 (i) High St Coloured Plan, item 97 PDF 1 MB
- Appx 4 (ii) Northumberland Place, item 97 PDF 697 KB
- Appx 5 Summary Feedback TRO, item 97 PDF 20 KB
Minutes:
Councillor Brian Webber in a statement commended the Cabinet for making so many decisions in public. He welcomed the fact that Cabinet were tackling the Bath High Street issues. He acknowledged that the Orange Grove decision would be a difficult one, but felt that Option 3 would only be a temporary solution which would not solve the coach parking problem.
Rob Hollingdale (Bath Taxi Association) made a statement appealing to Cabinet not to allow coaches to tail back in Orange Grove. He said he had collected over 5000 signatures in favour of retaining the taxi rank in Orange Grove.
Paul Thomas (Bath Taxi Association) made a statement in which he explained that allowing large numbers of people to queue at the student bus stop would result in bad behaviour which would be out of sight of the marshals.
Derek Noble (Empire Owners Association) in a statement welcomed the consultation. He observed that coaches, taxis and buses jostled for space at Orange Grove. He felt that the solution would be to provide a coach park. He favoured Option 2 in the short term, but emphasised the important role played by taxi marshals in ensuring good behaviour.
Councillor Tim Warren welcomed the project but did not express a preferred option. He gave credit to previous Cabinet members Charles Gerrish and Colin Darracott for their hard work leading up to this point. He observed however that there were not enough pedestrian crossings in the vicinity.
Adrian, a trader in Orange Grove, appealed to Cabinet to remember that the traders were dependent on the visitors who arrived by coach.
Annette Martin, a trader in Orange Grove, felt that the traders had not been adequately consulted over the proposals and asked to be given a copy of the consultation procedure.
A number of taxi drivers made short ad hoc statements in favour of retaining the taxi rank in Orange Grove.
Juliet, a trader in Orange Grove, felt that Orange Grove was an ideal dropping off point for coaches, who could then drive off to a coach park (possibly Avon Street). The loss of footfall if coaches were banned would be critical for local traders.
Councillor Cherry Beath introduced the report. She thanked all those who had contributed to the debate, including those who had responded to the consultation. She felt that the public realm improvements would enhance the pedestrian experience and that this would itself produce improved trading conditions in Orange Grove. She responded to Councillor Warren’s comments about pedestrian crossings by observing that there was an improved crossing place in the plans. She acknowledged that the improvements would have to take place as a long term programme but was determined that there should be an overarching strategy in place.
Councillor Roger Symonds thanked Councillor Webber for his remarks. He stressed that the High Street project must not be delayed further and reminded Cabinet that the 3 options had been the subject of consultation since May. He explained that he preferred Option 1, under which ... view the full minutes text for item 97
: