Issue - meetings

There will be a verbal update on this item.

Councillor Mark Elliott, Cabinet Member for Resources (supported by Damien Peak) introduced the report. He reported that overall, the responses have been pretty positive, including that from the Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB). He stated that there were some negative responses from those who would be negatively affected by changes. He further added that a significant minority did not understand the proposals which underlines the need for further and clearer communications.

The officer outlined some of the themes of the responses – he underlined the need for clearer communications to signpost people to financial and mental health support. He concluded that it had been a successful consultation and explained that a full detailed analysis would be reported to Council.

Panel members made the following points and asked the following questions:

Councillor Simon commented that the consultation had done well in reaching hard to engage groups. He noted that Council will make the final decision. The officer stated that responses can be bias depending on how the changes would affect the responder.

Councillor Halsall stated that it was imperative that the message is put across to those affected.

Following a request from Councillor Hodge, the officer set out the numbers on those affected:

2,700 – households would benefit

1,000 – households would lose out

190 – household would see no change

The Cabinet Member stated that this is not a cost saving exercise and that the aim is to improve the equity of the scheme and protect the most vulnerable. The officer stated that these aims must be made clear.

The Chair thanked the Cabinet Member and officer.