Issue - meetings

Update on activities of the Council's Property Company (ADL)

Meeting: 12/09/2018 - Resources Policy Development and Scrutiny Panel (Item 20)

20 Update on accounts of the Council's Property Company (ADL) pdf icon PDF 73 KB

The report attached for the Panel will also be debated at Council on September 13th 2018.

:

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Cabinet Member for Finance and Efficiency introduced the report which outlined the annual accounts of Aequus Developments Limited (ADL), Aequus Construction Limited (ACL) and he gave a verbal update on the annual accounts of Bath Tourism Plus (BTP).

 

ADL

 

The Cabinet Member explained that there were 22 units of accommodation and that the void rate was 3% which was below normal expectations. He added that the units were let at an acceptable and commercial level.

 

Panel members made the following points and asked the following questions:

 

Councillor Furse asked why there were only 2 Directors on ACL when there were 6 on ADL. The Cabinet Member explained that in reality both are run as one company with ACL being the construction element.

 

Councillor Furse asked what ‘relatively affordable’ meant. The Cabinet Member explained that a lot of thought had gone in to pitching this at a level which is right for the city while not being too high or significantly undercutting other landlords.

 

Councillor Furse asked what was meant by ‘streamline the refurbishment process’ (page 18 of the report). The Cabinet member stated that he would ask officers to brief the Panel on the details at a later date. Councillor O Brien suggested that officers could give more details on this at the Council meeting to be held the following day (13th September 2018).

 

Councillor Furse asked what ‘administrative expenses’ were (page 32 of the report). The Cabinet Member explained that this did include the cost of the officer’s time

 

Councillor Rayment asked if any modelling had been done around letting at different levels. The Cabinet Member explained that certain groups had been targeted such as young professionals as this was where there had been an identified shortfall in available property. He explained that the low void rate showed that the level was pitched correctly.

 

Councillor Rayment asked if there were any plans to let at a social level. The Cabinet Member explained that the direction of travel was developing sites for new builds where the Council’s requirements for social housing will be met.

 

ACL

 

The Cabinet Member explained that ACL is the construction company and is in its first year. ACL was currently converting 95 flats in Keynsham.

 

Panel members made the following points and asked the following questions:

 

Councillor O Brien asked how many flats are for sale and how many for rent and at what level. She also asked about the level of risk involved. The Cabinet Member explained that the final breakdown (for sale/rent) is yet to be determined and that the objective was to be a good but not greedy landlord. He added that the risk would be if sales or rentals were not achieved but that so far there had been over 200 expressions of interest.

 

Councillor Davis asked if landlords will be prevented from making multiple purchases for ‘buy to let’ schemes. The Cabinet Member explained that every effort is being made to prevent multiple purchases but it is more difficult  ...  view the full minutes text for item 20

: