Decision details
Wansdyke Business Centre, Midsomer Norton (WL)
Decision Maker: Corporate Policy Development and Scrutiny Panel
Decision status: Item Called In
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: Yes
Purpose:
The paper is seeking approval to close the
Wansdyke Business Centre in Midsomer Norton. Following professional
advice if the Centre is to remain in operation significant
investment would be required from the Council to upgrade the
building and adopt an operational business/serviced office support
model that is financially sustainable for the long term.
Decision:
To approve Option 3 – closure of the Wansdyke Business Centre and returning the long leasehold to the market, as office, industrial and warehouse accommodation.
NOTE: on 16th March 2023 this decision was called-in by 17 Councillors. The call-in request was verified by the Chief Executive and the Monitoring Officer.
Reasons for the decision:
The Wansdyke Business Centre is loss-making and requires a subsidy from the Council. If the Centre were to remain in operation significant investment would be required, which in turn would result in rental charges that vastly exceed comparative market rates.
The provision of services offices or offices for SMEs is currently considered to be sufficiently provided for in the private sector in the locality, and no additional Council support in the form of a dedicated building for such purpose is considered necessary. Other business support services are available from the Council.
There is no demand from the Council to utilise the offices for additional staffing provision.
As a result, and considering the critical lack of supply of industrial/warehouse accommodation in Bath & North East Somerset, the decision to approve closure of the Wansdyke Business Centre and return to market as office, industrial and warehouse has been taken.
Alternative options considered:
Fouroptions havebeen considered: -
Option1 considersthe necessaryimprovements and estimatedcosts of renovating the Wansdyke Business Centre, that could justify the minimum average rental levels.
Option 2 assesses likely centre demand at the minimum average rental levels with no major refurbishment taking place, onlynecessary works.
Option 3 considers closure of the Wansdyke Business Centre and returning the long leasehold to the market, as office, industrial and warehouse accommodation.
Option4 Occupation byCouncil Staff/Departments
The provision of serviced offices or offices for SME’s is currently considered to be sufficiently provided for in the private sector in the locality, and no additional Council support in the form of a dedicated building for such purpose is considered necessary. Other business support services are available from the Council.
Options 1 &2 are therefore discountedand would resultin savings of expenditure and resources. Option 4 has been considered, however, there appears to be sufficient property within the Council’s corporate property estate to satisfy any requirements for additional offices for administration or other purposes.
Publication date: 09/03/2023
Date of decision: 09/03/2023
Issue status: The decision is currently being reconsidered
This decision has been called in by:
- Councillor Colin Blackburn who writes The undersigned Councillors wish to call-in decision E3452 taken by Cabinet Member for Economic Development, Regeneration & Growth and Cabinet Member for Resources on Thursday 9th March 2023. ""To approve Option 3 - Closure of the Wensdyke Business Centre and returning the long leasehold to the market, as office, industrial and warehouse accommodation". Reasons for call-in: (1) There has been no opportunity for elected members to scrutinise the proposal. Whilst the propoerty services and/or economic development officers have clearly had an agenda towards this facility for a long time, their actions have never been scrutinised and the Cabinet Member appears to have been guided to a decision without considering the impacts to the economy, business opportunities nor the negative impact to the climate emergency objectives. There is no clear strategy to achieve anything with the stated aim of returning the long lease "to the market". (2) No scrutiny of the financial implications to both the council nor the community have been established and we wish to have a fuller understanding of the justifications reached in this decision as we believe they do not meet the council's stated aims, especially towards Economic Development, Regneration & Growth and are detrimental to the Climate Emergency. 17 Signatures: Cllr Colin Blackburn (lead) Cllr Doug Deacon Cllr Sarah Bevan Cllr Vic Pritchard Cllr Sally Davis Cllr Alan Hale Cllr Yukteshwar Kumar Cllr Michael Evans Cllr Karen Walker Cllr June Player Cllr Lisa O'Brien Cllr Brian Simmons Cllr Karen Warrington Cllr Eleanor Jackson Cllr Victor Clarke Cllr Chris Watt Cllr Robin Moss"
Accompanying Documents: