Meeting documents
Cabinet
Wednesday, 30th June, 2004
11111
Bath & North East Somerset Council |
|||
MEETING: |
Council Executive |
PAPER |
|
DATE: |
30 June 2004 |
||
TITLE: |
|||
WARD: |
All |
||
AN OPEN PUBLIC ITEM |
|||
List of attachments to this report: Appendix: Four Monthly Performance Report for Education Services (May 2004) |
1 THE ISSUE
1.1 This report invites the Executive to note the progress of the Education Service in the Spring of 2004.
2 RECOMMENDATION
The Council Executive is asked to agree that:
2.1 The Executive notes and approves the progress and achievements of the Education Service.
3
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
3.1 The report does not in itself propose any new expenditure.
4 THE REPORT
4.1 The Education Director reports under the appropriate headings progress made and work still to be done to achieve goals. Performance Indicators are also reported, many of which in Education track a national annual cycle.
5 RISK MANAGEMENT
A risk assessment related to the relevant items has been undertaken in compliance with the Council's decision making risk management guidance.
6 RATIONALE
6.1 This report to the Executive forms part of the Council's performance management system.
7 OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED
7.1 Not applicable.
8 CONSULTATION
8.1 The report is formed by all Team Leaders within Education reporting to their Head of Service, who in turn report to the Director.
Contact person |
Mike Young, Education Director. Tel. 01225 394200 |
Background papers |
Nil |
Report to Directors' Group
4-Monthly Performance Report
Date |
17 May 2004 |
Reporting Area |
Education |
Lead Director |
Mike Young |
SCOPE OF REPORTING AREA
All aspects of the Education Service are covered by this report, including schools, Arts, Adult and Youth and Community Education.
The restructuring of the `Inclusion' Service within Education replaces the previous pupil support and special needs services.
1. Progress / Issue Reporting |
|||||
Progress Made |
Issues to be addressed |
Who |
By When |
||
Leadership Updates on previous report |
· Map of future provision for Special Needs near completion. |
· Review of Role of the three special schools which will remain. |
Head of Inclusion |
Sept 2004 |
|
· Consultation on two sites for new Keynsham School. |
· Decision on recommendation for site for new school. |
Head of Strategy & Manage-ment |
July 2004 |
||
· Executive recommendations on three school closures from North and Central Bath Review. |
· Public consultation on those recommendations will follow. |
Head of Strategy & Manage-ment |
July 2004 |
||
· All Education Teams have now reviewed their current performance against Ofsted criteria. |
· Evidence trails for progress made. |
Head of Strategy & Manage-ment |
Jan 05 |
||
· New management structure for Inclusion refocuses services. |
· Developing inclusion guidance for schools and ensuring consistency of treatment of individuals. |
Head of Inclusion |
April 2005 |
||
· Special measures at Lime Grove School to be addressed by early merger with Summerfield School. |
· Ensure effective transition, improve teaching and curriculum for Lime Grove pupils. |
Head of School Improve-ment |
September 2004 |
||
Leadership New items |
· Partnership for rapid improvement of Somervale School agreed with Norton Hill. |
· Ensure sufficient funding for rapid progress. · HMI review of progress mid-May. |
Education Director |
September 2004 |
|
· Proposed working group with headteachers on Extended Schools. |
· Develop a detailed strategy for extended schools and move this forward. |
Head of Inclusion |
October 2004 |
People Management Updates on previous report |
· Primary Inclusion Adviser appointed to replace Special Needs Adviser. |
· Advice to secondary schools on inclusion. |
Head of School Improve-ment |
December 2004 |
· Transfer of part of personnel to HBS completed. |
· Re-engineering work of remaining staff - see also new item below. |
Head of Strategy & Manage-ment |
September 2004 |
|
· Inclusion Manager appointed; will start late May. |
· Ensuring clear role within restructured service. |
Head of Inclusion |
September 2004 |
|
People New items |
· Discussions to boost personnel capacity by greater involvement of advisers with headteacher experience. |
· Appropriate guidance on where they can help and the limits to this. |
Head of Strategy & Manage-ment |
September 2004 |
Partnership & Resources Updates on previous report |
· New funding model for special needs in secondary schools, greater devolution. |
· Primary Model to follow next year. |
Education Director |
April 2005 |
· Funding for information sharing project (from DfES) could end September 2004. |
· Loss of staff expertise, slowing down of progress, if no 2005/6 funding. |
Head of Inclusion |
September 2004 |
|
Partnership & Resources New items |
· Final `no' from Secretary of State to Bath Academy proposal. |
· Pursue other options for funding capital improvement. |
Education Director |
April 2005 |
· Agreed additional Capital of £900,000 to meet corporate priority. |
· Ensuring most effective use of resource against scale of refurbishment needs. |
Head of Strategy & Manage-ment |
May 2004 |
|
Policy and Strategy Updates on previous report |
· Uncertainty over future funding of Adult Education, due to LSC decision not to proceed with sub regional service. |
· Future of service in discussion with LSC and other major providers (like the Colleges) |
Education Director |
September 2004 |
· School Standards Improvement Project nearing completion, has reported to Overview and Scrutiny Panel. |
· Improvement to advisory systems and focus of work, particularly balancing needs of all schools against those in difficulty. |
Head of School Improve-ment |
July 2004 |
|
· 10 point action plan agreed between Education and Social Services to address issues from the "Children Bill". |
· Developing specific action and targets. |
Head of Inclusion |
September 2004 |
· Agreement reached on temporary location for KS1 Behaviour Unit and possible permanent site identified in Norton Radstock in collaboration with school. |
· Establishing role and operation of a pupil referral unit for young pupils. |
Head of Inclusion |
September 2004 |
|
· Strategic Area Review local group has reviewed available data. |
· Recommended options for 14-19 provision by July. |
Education Director |
July 2004 |
|
Policy and Strategy New items |
· Review of Early Years Plan by new manager. |
· Most effective use of government grants. · Future of maintained nurseries. |
Head of School Improve-ment |
September 2004 |
· LSC funding for post-16 teaching and learning. |
· Address post-16 standards by improvements to the quality of teaching and learning. |
Head of School Improve-ment |
September 2004 |
|
Processes Updates on previous report |
· `Balanced Scorecard' concept introduced to all team leaders. |
· Team development of their own scorecard to contribute to overall service scorecard. |
Head of Strategy & Manage-ment |
July 2004 |
Processes New items |
· Three year research programme with Bath University supported by DfES an LSC. |
· Investigate gender differences in performance and develop intervention strategies. |
Head of School Improve-ment |
September 2004-2007 |
2. Reporting on targets and commitments made in the Performance Plan
Summary of Performance
Performance Targets |
No. |
% |
RED |
2 |
6 |
AMBER |
0 |
0 |
GREEN |
27 |
91 |
NOT KNOWN |
1 |
3 |
TOTAL |
30 |
100 |
Ref No |
Indicator |
Best 25% in 2001-2002 |
B&NES |
B&NES |
B&NES |
03/04 estimated outturn |
Status |
COMMENT |
EXAMINATION RESULTS |
||||||||
38 |
% of 15 year old pupils achieving 5 or more GCSEs at grades A*-C or equivalent |
53% |
57% |
58.40% |
62% |
60.0% |
G |
|
39 |
% of 15 year old pupils in schools maintained achieving 5 or more GCSEs at Grade A*-G or equivalent |
N/A |
N/A |
90% |
95% |
90% |
R |
Ground rules were changed here by compulsory inclusion of English and Mathematics. |
40 |
% of pupils achieving Level 4 or above in Key Stage 2 Mathematics |
74% |
74% |
78% |
80% |
76% |
G |
|
41 |
% of pupils achieving Level 4 or above in Key Stage 2 English |
78% |
78% |
79% |
81% |
78% |
G |
|
181a |
% of 14 year old pupils achieving Level 5 or above in the Key Stage 3 test in English |
N/A |
N/A |
69% |
76% |
74% |
G |
|
181b |
% of 14 year old pupils achieving Level 5 or above in the Key Stage 3 test in Mathematics |
N/A |
N/A |
73% |
79% |
76% |
G |
|
181c |
% of 14 year old pupils achieving Level 5 or above in the Key Stage 3 test in Science |
N/A |
N/A |
73% |
77% |
74% |
G |
|
181d |
% of 14 year old pupils achieving Level 5 or above in the Key Stage 3 test in ICT assessment |
N/A |
N/A |
77% |
77% |
79% |
G |
|
194a |
% of pupils achieving Level 5 or above in Key Stage 2 in English |
N/A |
N/A |
33% |
33% |
31% |
G |
|
194b |
% of pupils achieving Level 5 or above in Key Stage 2 in Mathematics |
N/A |
N/A |
31% |
32% |
31% |
G |
|
OFSTED INSPECTIONS |
||||||||
48 |
% of schools subject to special measures |
2.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
1.0% |
0% |
G |
|
EDUCATION EXPENDITURE |
||||||||
193a |
Schools budget as percentage of Schools Funding Assessment |
N/A |
N/A |
New |
107% |
107 |
G |
Completed as per Section 52 and checked by Audit Commission. |
193b |
Increase in Schools Budget on the previous year as a percentage of the increase in Schools Funding Assessment |
N/A |
N/A |
New |
102% |
102 |
G |
Completed as per Section 52 and checked by Audit Commission. |
33 |
Net Youth Service expenditure per head of population in the Youth Service target age range. |
£84.36 (Average) |
£101.83 |
£85.69 |
£87 |
£86.02 |
G |
Basis of measurement changed 2001/2. Hence target changed from published figure of £65.72. |
TEACHER TRAINING |
||||||||
192a |
Average days access training per practitioner delivering Foundation Stage education |
N/A |
N/A |
New |
4 |
4 |
G |
|
Ref No |
Indicator |
Best 25% in 2001-2002 |
B&NES |
B&NES |
B&NES |
03/04 estimated outturn |
Status |
COMMENT |
192b |
Average number of QTS (Qualified Teacher Status) teachers per 10 non-maintained settings |
N/A |
N/A |
New |
1 |
1.7 |
G |
|
SCHOOL PLACES |
||||||||
34a |
% of primary schools with 25% or more (and 30+) of their places unfilled |
7.4% |
11.5% |
14.7% |
14.7% |
14.7% |
G |
Continued fall in pupil numbers. Primary area review will have an impact in medium term. |
34b |
% of secondary schools with 25% or more (and 30+) of their places unfilled |
0% |
7.7% |
7.7% |
15.38% |
15.38% |
G |
Review of Secondary Education aims to address surplus places. |
30 |
Number of 3 year olds who have access to a good quality free
early years education place. |
88% |
55% |
85% |
86% |
86% |
G |
Dependent on the Government who have provided more resources than expected. |
ABSENCE & EXCLUSION |
||||||||
44 |
Number of pupils permanently excluded during the year per 1,000 pupils |
0.85 |
1.7 |
1.98% |
0.9 |
0.9 |
G |
These figures are always reported a year in arrears. In reality we have achieved 0.9 for 2002/03 academic year but this will not be recorded until 2003/04. |
45 (new) |
% of half days missed due to total absence in secondary schools maintained by the local education authority |
0.6% |
1.1% |
1.0% |
8% |
G |
||
46 (new) |
% of time pupils missed due to total absence in primary schools maintained by the local authority |
0.3% |
0.3% |
0.2% |
5.1% |
G |
||
45 (old ind) |
% of half days missed due to unauthorised absence in secondary schools maintained by the local education authority |
0.7% |
0.6% |
8% |
1.0% |
0.8 |
G |
Again, reported in arrears. In reality we have exceeded the target set for 2003/04. NB - Targets revised upwards due to PSA target. |
46 (old ind) |
% of time pupils missed due to unauthorised absence in primary schools maintained by the local authority |
0.3% |
0.3% |
0.3% |
0.2% |
0.3 |
G |
This remains a challenging target but for both Secondary and Primary the actual attendance rate has increased. |
159a |
% of permanently excluded pupils provided with alternative
tuition of; |
N/A |
N/A |
0% |
0% |
|||
159b |
- 6-12 hours a week |
N/A |
N/A |
0% |
10% |
G |
Target exceeded by higher level of provision. |
|
159c |
- 13-19 hours a week |
N/A |
N/A |
10% |
40% |
G |
Target exceeded. |
|
159d |
More than 20 hours a week |
N/A |
N/A |
90% |
50% |
G |
||
SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS (SEN) |
||||||||
43a |
% of statements prepared within 18 weeks;- excluding those affected by "exceptions to the rule" under the SEN Code of Practice |
97% |
97% |
92.47% |
98% |
G |
This has been changed to a rolling average, which more accurately reflects performance. The team has been affected by staff changes in an area that requires considerable expertise. |
|
43b |
- including those affected by "exceptions to the rule" under the SEN Code of Practice |
78% |
88% |
75.44% |
87% |
R |
This target measures statements where outside agencies are involved. A working group with health should help speed things up. |
|
LL1 |
Improve the standard of learning and teaching for 11 to 14 year olds |
Do It |
G |
Key Stage 3 strategy showing successful in schools and results have improved this year. |
||||
LL3 |
Implement quality assurance systems throughout the Adult and Community Education Service |
Do It |
G |
Service making good progress. |
3. Equalities Targets
Service Area |
% of staff from BME communities |
% of staff considering themselves disabled |
Comment |
||
Actual |
Target |
Actual |
Target |
||
Education |
3.9 |
4.5 |
3.7 |
4 |
Monitoring of Ethnic Groups in Schools
Ethnic Group |
All Schools % |
British |
91.6 |
Irish |
0.2 |
Traveller of Irish Heritage |
0.0 |
Other White Background |
1.5 |
White & Black Caribbean |
0.7 |
White & Black African |
0.1 |
White & Asian |
0.3 |
Other Mixed Background |
1.0 |
Indian |
0.2 |
Pakistani |
0.1 |
Bangladeshi |
0.1 |
Other Asian Background |
0.2 |
Caribbean |
0.2 |
African |
0.1 |
Other Black Background |
0.2 |
Chinese |
0.2 |
Other Ethnic Group |
0.2 |
Refused |
2.0 |
Info not yet obtained |
1.0 |
% of Pupils declared White |
93.3 |
% of Total Pupils with Non Response |
3.0 |