Meeting documents

Cabinet
Monday, 29th July, 2002

Bath & North East Somerset Council

MEETING:

Council Executive

AGENDA
ITEM
NUMBER

MEETING DATE:

12 July 2002

TITLE:

Memorandum of Understanding, Norton Radstock Regeneration Company

WARD:

 

REPORT AUTHOR:

Clive Thomas

AN OPEN PUBLIC ITEM

List of attachments to this report:

Memorandum of Understanding between the Norton Radstock Regeneration Company and Bath and North East Somerset Council and the South West of England Regional Development Agency.

1 THE ISSUE

The Regeneration of Norton Radstock is of critical importance to the economic, environmental and social development of the area. In order to maximise the prospects for investment, both public and private, it is important to set out clearly the commitment, roles and responsibilities of the three core partners. Norton Radstock Regeneration Company (NRR) Bath and North East Somerset Council and the South West of England Regional Development Agency (SWERDA)

The proposed memorandum of understanding is not intended to be legally binding but rather set out and reflect the spirit of mutual support and co-operation that successful partnerships are founded on.

2 RECOMMENDATION

2.1 That the Executive agree the proposed Memorandum of Understanding and authorise the Strategic Director (Economic and Environmental Development) to confirm the Council's agreement to NRR.

3 THE REPORT: Background and Context.

SINGLE REGENERATION BUDGET PROGRAMME AND THE PURCHASE OF THE FORMER RAILWAY LAND.

3.1 The SRB Scheme is a six year regeneration programme running from 1997/98 financial year until the end of the current year, 2002/2003. The Scheme covers the Norton Radstock urban area and is in receipt of £2.944million in SRB grant funding. This is just under half the £6million sought when the Scheme was submitted through a competitive bidding process in 1996.

3.2 Initially the SRB Scheme was dominated by three large capital projects (the Radstock Site, Welton Vale and Council House Repairs) and the main outputs were to be those related to physical development; new business floorspace, housing, road infrastructure and related employment creation. In addition to physical development, there was also a limited number of education and community projects aimed at improving local skills, supporting families and enhancing personal development for young people.

3.3 Following extensive community participation and in response to changing circumstances, the Scheme has been significantly re-defined. The participation exercises identified improvement of 'community infrastructure' (sport, leisure, arts etc provision) as a key priority. Also, in response to the results of community participation, the Welton Vale greenfield development was dropped from the Scheme, whilst the justification for SRB funding for the Council House Repairs project was removed by transfer of the Council's Housing stock. These changes freed up funding which has enabled development of a much broader range of projects reflecting priorities identified by the community. The key outcomes for the revised Scheme are improved town centres, tourism development, enhanced skills and training provision, support and development for young people, families and community activity, improved community safety and improved facilities and opportunities for sports, arts and recreational activities. Whilst the SRB Scheme cannot fully meet all these needs, substantial progress has been made and the Scheme will leave a significant legacy of improvement to be built upon through continued community regeneration in the area. A schedule of SRB projects is attached as Appendix 1.

3.4 Within the SRB Scheme, redevelopment of the Radstock Site is by far the largest project and it remains a top priority. Community participation has established a 'Vision for Radstock' with development and enhancement of the Radstock Site as its key component. Through the project development process it became clear that the mix of uses and level of quality sought by the community and necessary to underpin long term regeneration, would not be achieved through a conventional development approach. Control of the land was identified as the key requirement and catalyst for attracting funding and developing partnerships as the basis for delivering a high quality, sustainable and innovative mixed used town centre regeneration project.

3.5 To enable delivery of the project, the Norton Radstock Regeneration Company (NRR) has been established as a not for profit company with the ability to recycle any financial surpluses generated, back into local regeneration. The company has two categories of unpaid directors, those representing stakeholders and those bringing special skills. There is considerable overlap between the categories with stakeholder members also having special skills and some specially skilled members also being local stakeholders.

3.6 Because the main part of the site was in the ownership of the British Railways Board, purchase of the land was subject to lengthy Government procedures that took two years to complete. In February 2001 the former landowners agreed to sell to NRR. subject to a six week completion period. This deadline was complied with and the land is now in the freehold ownership of NRR. The land purchase, inclusive of fees and duties, plus the costs of site security and management was financed through SRB funding of £788,400 and Council capital funding of £207,200 plus disposal of the Council's landholding within the site for nil consideration.

3.7 Since acquisition The Norton Radstock Regeneration Company's activities can be summarised under five key work areas;

1) Interim works.

Provision of public footpaths across and through the site.

Provision of safety fencing.

Clean up of debris from the site.

Securing unsafe buildings.

Renovation of advertising hoarding.

Clarified status of footpaths and are undertaking agreements to formalise.

2) Planning.

Negotiated existing outline planning application and then deciding to terminate discussions in favour of a new application.

Set out the Company position for the Local Plan first deposit.

Objected to Streetly Developments planning application for a superstore submitted on the Company land.

Gained Conservation Area Approval for demolition of buildings and structures on the site.

3) Developing the site.

Agreed an approach to developing the site.

Developed a strategic development framework for Radstock centre and the site.

Agreed and developed methodology for re-engaging with the local community in the development process.

Sought necessary funding for the development process.

Undertaken ecological survey and mitigation assessment work.

Commissioned survey of trees and culverts on the site.

Developed a brief for masterplanners to be engaged in future stages.

4) Partnering.

Strengthend links with key partners, e.g. SWRDA, B&NES Council, SUSTRANS etc.

5) Developing the business.

Developed a five year business plan.

Developed a mission statement and set of objectives.

Set up financial management monitoring systems.

Recruited and trained three new Directors.

Appointed a community relations and communications consultant.

Undertaken perception research.

Developed a communications strategy.

Agreed a budget.

Set up effective meeting and reporting structures.

3.8 Summary of regeneration proposals forwarded to SWERDA and business plan.

3.9 The Norton Radstock Regeneration Company believes that the land in their ownership is crucial to the creation of a new heart for Radstock, both in itself, and in the impact it will have on other land within the town. As such the Company have adopted the following mission statement :

"The Norton Radstock Regeneration Company will be a catalyst for the provision of creative, quality, sustainable development and regeneration. We will practice an inclusive, accountable approach, working together with the local community, maintaining open, honest and clear communication".

3.10 The Company aim to achieve the regeneration of Radstock town centre through the development of its site and by engaging with other landowners within the town. Its key aims are;

· Create a sustainable town centre to serve local people and visitors through development of the site and links to other projects;

· Establish a sense of place.

· Develop a broader economic base.

· Improve community infrastructure.

· Engage and provide for the whole community.

· Develop the land in a truly sustainable way building upon the environmental quality of the site at present.

3.11 The Company has set out an approach to developing this site to the South West of England Regional Development Agency (SWRDA) in a bid to secure additional funding. This will be used to progress the proposals for the site on from conceptual drawing to viable and realistic proposals based upon the original aspirations of the community, but enhanced to accommodate increased aspirations with regards to sustainability, better knowledge about site constraints (e.g. ecology, trees, culvert etc.), and changed government policy.

3.12 The Company is seeking around £750,000 from SWRDA. Proposals were put to SWRDA in March and negotiations are continuing. The bulk of the money would be used to create enhanced plans for a new outline planning application and the securing of a development partner. Some of this money would enable the Company to employ staff and therefore manage and progress the work. At present, and since January, the Company has had a project co-ordinator part time seconded from Bath and North East Somerset Council.

3.13 The timescales for implementation are set out within the Memorandum of Understanding but are obviously dependent on securing the necessary funding from SWRDA.

3.14 Following the design and feasibility stage of work, further funding may be required from SWRDA to undertake infrastructure works or secure non-viable elements of the proposals.

3 The Report Proposals.

4.1 An investor in the Norton Radstock area will seek to see that the Council is fully committed to the regeneration aspirations and is prepared to apply its skills, experience and CPO powers to support agreed proposals. The Memorandum of Understanding expresses a commitment from all three parties to achieve the regeneration of Radstock and the respective roles in achieving this.

The memorandum of understanding proposes the Council contributes;

· Land within the regeneration area which is surplus to Service requirements

· Treats NRR as preferred developer within the regeneration area.

· Reinvests net proceeds from land sales within the regeneration area for agreed purposes.

· Use its CPO powers if necessary.

· Develop supplementary planning guidance relating to the regeneration area.

· Through the Development Team actively engage in the Masterplanning process with agreed milestones.

· Provide senior officer attendance at NRR Board Meetings

· Maintain one Councillor as a Member and Director of NRR Company

· Consider specific development proposals through the Development Team.

4.2 The key commitments from NRR Company are as set out below;

· Develop the Railway Lands in a sustainable manner

· Pursue development and regeneration in an inclusive basis working with the local community

· Utilise best practise and innovation particularly in regard to sustainability.

· Reinvest any `surplus' finance created in the regeneration of the Norton Radstock via the creation of a Community Development Charitable Trust.

· Pursue high standards of quality in all areas of work particularly in relation to sustainability and communication.

· Maintain dynamic risk management regime on detailed project programme.

· Contribute to the wider regeneration of the area through links with other projects and organisations.

Contact person

Clive Thomas or Jeremy Smalley

Background papers