Meeting documents
Cabinet
Wednesday, 15th January, 2003
Appendix
LMS REVIEW 2002 |
|||||
ANALYSIS OF CONSULTATION RESPONSES |
|||||
question |
average response |
||||
no. |
topic |
specifics |
pri |
sec |
other |
1 |
principles |
Any Principles no longer appropriate? |
85% no |
100%no |
|
2 |
ALR |
Class size and curriculum assumptions OK? |
1.9 |
3.4 |
|
3 |
ALR |
Monitoring,developmentand support time OK? |
2.1 |
3.2 |
|
4 |
ALR |
teacher cost assumptions OK? |
2.2 |
3.2 |
|
5 |
ALR |
Management time assumptions OK? |
2.4 |
3.4 |
|
6 |
ALR |
Primary-Support staff time OK? |
2.1 |
3.0 |
|
7 |
ALR |
Admin and Caretaking staff time OK? |
2.0 |
2.9 |
|
8 |
ALR |
Secondary support time OK? |
2.7 |
2.7 |
|
9 |
ALR |
Curriculum resources allocation OK? |
93%yes |
50% yes |
|
10 |
ALR |
Teacher protection proposals OK? |
2.1 |
2.4 |
|
11 |
ALR |
Use of 3 year rolling average OK? |
1.9 |
2.4 |
|
12 |
ALR |
Support staff protection proposals OK? |
1.9 |
2.3 |
|
13 |
ALR |
Premises costs 50:50 OK? |
2.8 |
2.1 |
|
14 |
ALR |
Current expenditure as estimate of need OK? |
2.6 |
3.1 |
|
15 |
ALR |
Lump sum OK? |
1.9 |
2.7 |
|
16 |
AEN |
Threshold for Social Deprivation change? |
88%yes |
50% yes |
|
17 |
AEN |
Threshold weightings for Social Depreviation OK? |
88% yes |
50%yes |
|
18 |
AEN |
Lump sum for Social Deprivation OK? |
73%yes |
100% n0 |
|
19 |
AEN |
Should total quantum be increased? |
65% yes |
100% no |
|
20 |
Secondary |
Agree with definition of split site? |
2.0 |
2.6 |
|
21 |
Secondary |
Agree with allocation of split site in secondary? |
2.8 |
3.3 |
|
22 |
Primary |
Should primary allocation remain unchanged? |
2.5 |
2.7 |
|
23 |
Secondary |
Excluding non reviewed items from rescaling? |
2.6 |
1.9 |
|
24 |
Secondary |
Protection applied to all schools ? |
1.7 |
2.0 |
|
25 |
Secondary |
Implement in 2003/2004? |
n/a |
60%yes |
|
26 |
Secondary |
Implement over 3years or 5 years? |
n/a |
68% 3years |
|
27 |
ICS |
Agree with formula for infant class size? |
2.1 |
2.8 |
|
28 |
ICS |
Do you agree with limit of 120 pupils? |
2.2 |
2.6 |
|
sen1 |
SEN |
Do you agree with delegating funding? |
2.1 |
2.8 |
|
sen2 |
SEN |
Do you agree with principles of delegation ? |
2.2 |
2.3 |
|
sen3 |
SEN |
So you agee with using entry data? |
2.6 |
3.3 |
|
sen4 |
SEN |
Option 1 or Option2? |
58% option 1 |
50% option 1 |
|
sen5 |
SEN |
Statements are not issued or maintained? |
2.9 |
3.0 |
|
number of responses |
36 |
10 |
|||
Key to average response: |
|||||
"3" means schools in favour balanced by schools opposed |
|||||
The closer to "1" the stronger the net agreement with the proposal |
|||||
The closer to "5" the stronger the net disagreement with the proposal |