Meeting documents
Cabinet
Wednesday, 8th February, 2006
West of England Waste Partnership Appendix 2
Project Board
6 January 2006
WEST OF ENGLAND WASTE MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING STRATEGY
JOINT WASTE PLANNING - UPDATE REPORT
Recommendation (Revised)
1. The Project Board is requested to recommend to the four Unitary Authorities
that they:
a. Work together to prepare a Joint Waste Development Plan Document for the West of England and to amend their respective Local Development Schemes accordingly;
b. Jointly prepare a Project Plan for production of the Joint Waste Development Plan Document, to be approved by Executive Members/Chief Officers as appropriate in each Unitary Authority, to include clear project management arrangements, a detailed project timetable and breakdown of costs;
c. Clearly identify through Chief Officers, and subsequently provide, the resources required to progress the Joint Waste Development Plan Document through its statutory stages to adoption, covering internal staff costs; consultancy fees; and incidental costs including the cost of the Public Examination;
d. Appoint consultants to assist in the preparation of the Joint Waste Development Plan Document on the basis of a Specification to be approved by Unitary Authority Executive Members/Chief Officers as appropriate in each Unitary Authority.
Background
2. This report updates the Waste Planning report, under Item 3 following a meeting between Unitary Authority and Government Officers for the South West Officers on 5 January 2006.
3. The previously circulated report refers at paragraphs 8 - 14 to the informal advice from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister on the best way forward for strategic waste planning in the West of England. This update report describes the amended recommended process and procedures for preparing a joint waste development plan document for the West of England.
West of England Joint Waste Development Plan
Document
4. The proposal is that the Unitary Authorities prepare a joint waste development plan document for the West of England. Such a thematic document would include a strategic waste planning statement and would identify the key site or sites or locations for a range of strategic waste management facilities across the plan area. It could also include appropriate criteria based policies.
5. The range of strategic waste management facilities could include major new waste management capacity, including a network of composting facilities, civic amenity sites, and sites for landfill or landraise sites.
6. Government advice is that waste should not be considered in isolation from other planning concerns. The Joint Waste Development Plan Document would inform the Core Strategies of each Local Development Framework. This would enable the integration of sustainable waste management with other areas of spatial planning such as housing and transport.
7. A joint waste development plan document would also provide a framework for the development of local waste planning policies, and each Unitary Authority would decide the most appropriate way in which these may be prepared and presented.
8. The integration between a joint waste development plan document and the joint municipal waste management strategy would provide significant benefits in terms of aligning the processes at key stages. This would optimise the use of resources, would provide opportunities to share consultation arrangements and would reduce the potential for conflict between these inter-dependent delivery systems for sustainable waste management. It would also help simplify the key waste management and planning issues and help illuminate the essential waste management options for the West of England.
9. The issue of conformity with the Core Strategies of the four
Unitary Authority areas can be clarified. The Joint Waste
Development Plan Document would need to be in general conformity
with the Regional Spatial Strategy, incorporating the Regional
Waste Strategy but it would in turn inform the Core Strategies of
each constituent Authority area.
Delivering New Waste Management Capacity
10. A development plan document of the nature proposed, which
would focus on strategic waste management issues and the
identification of key sites, has the potential of being prepared in
a shorter timescale as compared with the previously recommended
Joint Core Waste Strategy and separately prepared sites allocations
documents. The particular advantage is that the consideration of
appropriate sites / locations would be at an earlier stage than
previously envisaged. This would enable more effective and
realistic assessment of the waste management options identified as
part of the MEL / RPS waste studies.
11. The Project Plan will need to be revised to show the timeline and key milestones for the waste management and waste planning strategies. In addition, the links to procurement will need to be identified, so as to ensure that time and resources are effectively managed.
Timeline and Reporting Procedures
12. The Indicative Project Timeline illustrated in the previously circulated Project Brief will need to be reviewed. The assumption is that the process of preparing a development plan document will take some 36 months. The Board of the West of England Partnership have indicated their strong support for joint working on waste planning and waste management, but at the same time have requested that the indicative timescale of 36 months is reviewed and all effort made to reduce the plan preparation time. This will need to be an early task for the Officers Steering Group, but much will depend on the reporting procedures within each Authority.
The Next Steps
13. Following the Officer meeting with the Government Office for the South West the recommendation to the Project Board has now been amended to reflect the proposal to prepare a joint waste development plan document.
14. The substantive recommendation is that the Project Board should recommend to the Unitary Authorities that a Joint Waste Development Plan Document be prepared in accordance with a revised Project Brief. The necessary revisions to the Project Brief will need to be agreed with the appropriate Executive Members and Chief Officers.
15. Following agreement of each Unitary Authority it will be necessary to seek the agreement of the Government Office for the South West for an appropriate amendment to each Local Development Scheme. This should be on the basis of an identical specification of the scope of the joint waste development plan document. Again, this will need to be agreed with the appropriate Executive Members and Chief Officers.
16. There may be consequential changes to Local Development Schemes that the Authorities may wish to make, to reflect the intention to prepare a West of England Joint Waste Development Plan Document. That will be a matter for each Authority to resolve.
Allan Davies
5 January 2006
Annex 1 to Appendix 2 West of England
Waste Management and Planning Strategy
Project Brief
West of England Joint Waste
Development Plan Document
Bath and North East Somerset Council, Bristol City Council,
North Somerset Council and South Gloucestershire
Council.
1. Context
1.1 The West of England Waste Management and Planning Strategy aims to deliver waste treatment capacity between now and 2020 and beyond to manage municipal waste arising from the West of England and to establish for all other wastes, the tonnage / treatment requirements of the Regional Waste Strategy. A Project Board has been established to implement the Strategy, principally by making appropriate recommendations to the four Unitary Authorities of the West of England in their role as waste planning and waste management authorities.
1.2 This Project Brief describes the scope and process for preparing a Joint Waste Development Plan Document. This is an important component of the West of England Waste Management and Planning Strategy. It incorporates a strategic waste planning statement and identifies the key site(s) or locations for a range of strategic waste management facilities that are essential for sustainable waste management across the West of England. It will inform the Core Strategies of each Local Development Framework and will provide spatial planning guidance for the preparation of more detailed waste policies and proposals within other appropriate development plan documents in the West of England.
1.3 A major financial driver for the Project is the introduction of the Landfill Allowance Trading Scheme (LATS), which potentially involves the imposition of significant fines on authorities who fail to divert sufficient tonnages of biodegradable municipal waste from landfill by specified target dates.
2. Project Aims
2.1 The aim of the West of England Joint Waste Development Plan
Document is to set out the number, type and size of facilities
required in the West of England to manage municipal and other
wastes over the period to 2020 and beyond within the context of the
emerging Regional Spatial Strategy and the Regional Waste Strategy.
Where facilities are of strategic significance, the Joint Waste
Development Plan Document will either identify the site required
for the specific proposed development(s) or otherwise indicate
their broad location(s), leaving it to separate sites allocations
development plan documents to identify the sites.
2.2 The remit of the West of England Joint Waste Development
Plan Document includes the identification of:
· the need for new strategic municipal waste management
facilities. This will be informed by the emerging Joint Municipal
Waste Strategy and Municipal Waste Management Strategies adopted by
each of the Unitary Authorities;
· the range of strategic waste management facilities will
include major new waste management capacity, including a network of
(in-vessel or other) composting facilities, civic amenity sites,
and sites for landfill or landraise sites;
· the need for the strategic waste management
requirements for non-municipal wastes, including commercial and
industrial, construction and demolition waste and agricultural
wastes. Where possible the Joint Waste Core Strategy will apportion
the requirements for these strategic non-municipal waste facilities
to individual Unitary Authority areas.
2.3 The Project Brief identifies the key milestones (see
Appendix 1) at which decisions will need to be made by the four
Unitary Authorities. The resources that are estimated to be
required to prepare the Joint Waste Development Plan Document are
identified over the period of plan preparation so as to ensure that
the planning objectives of the Strategy can be delivered on time
and within budgets. The required resources will need to be kept
under review.
2.4 Table 1 indicates the Regional Waste Strategy waste management capacities for Municipal Waste, Commercial and Industrial Waste and Construction and Demolition Waste. This assumes that each sub-region will be self-sufficient in waste management facilities to manage the waste produced in that sub-region.
Table 1 Indicative Annual Municipal Waste Management Capacities for the West of England - Regional Waste Strategy - Appendix C |
|||
2010 |
2013 |
2020 |
|
Minimum Source Separated (000s t/annum) |
230 |
280 |
310 |
Maximum Secondary Treatment (000s t/annum) |
150 |
220 |
370 |
Maximum Landfill (000s t/annum) |
300 |
240 |
120 |
Indicative Annual Commercial and Industrial Waste Management Capacities |
|||
2010 |
2013 |
2020 |
|
Recycling / reuse (000s t/annum) |
420 - 460 |
440 - 490 |
490 - 530 |
Recovery (000s t/annum) |
220 - 240 |
280 - 310 |
430 - 470 |
Landfilled (000s t/annum |
470 - 515 |
390 - 430 |
190 - 200 |
Indicative Inert and Construction and Demolition Waste Management Capacities |
|||
2010 |
2013 |
2020 |
|
Treatment (000s t/annum) |
- |
- |
- |
Transfer (000s t/annum) |
220 |
220 |
220 |
Landfill (000s t/annum |
380 |
380 |
380 |
3. Overview
3.1 The West of England Joint Waste Development Plan Document
will set out a planning strategy for sustainable waste management
in the area of the constituent Unitary Authorities. It will contain
policies and proposals for waste planning to deliver the Strategy
consistent with the emerging Regional Spatial Strategy and the
Regional Waste Strategy (which is to be reviewed in 2007) so as to
enable sufficient and suitable provision of waste management
facilities in appropriate locations.
3.2 Where appropriate, it is intended that the Joint Waste
Development Plan Document will make specific site allocations for
strategic waste management facilities, the Development Plan
Document will inform the individual Core Strategies of each Unitary
Authority area and will guide individual waste-related sites
allocations development plan documents in their task of identifying
and allocating sites for those strategic (and local) waste
management facilities not allocated by the Joint Waste Development
Plan Document . The Joint Waste Development Plan Document will
guide development control decisions in respect of planning
applications for strategic waste management facilities.
3.3 The Joint Waste Development Plan Document will provide for
an integrated approach to waste planning and waste management.
There is an opportunity to align the process of preparing the Joint
Waste Development Plan Document and the Joint Municipal Waste
Strategy (see Figure 1 above). This would optimise the use of
resources, would provide opportunities to share consultation
arrangements and would reduce the potential for conflict between
these inter-dependent delivery systems for sustainable waste
management.
3.4 The guidance in PPS10 Planning for Sustainable Waste
Management is that sites should be allocated to support the
pattern of waste management facilities set out in the Regional
Spatial Strategy in accordance with the identified broad locations
and apportionment. PPS10 expects waste planning authorities to be
able to:
B7 demonstrate how capacity equivalent to at least ten years of
the annual rates set out in the Regional Spatial Strategy could be
provided;
B7 identify the type or types of waste management facility that
would be appropriately located on the allocated site or in the
allocated area, taking care to avoid stifling innovation in line
with the waste hierarchy; and
B7 avoid unrealistic assumptions on the prospects for the
development of waste management facilities or of particular sites
or area.
3.5 The operational period of the Joint Waste Development Plan
Document will run from its anticipated date of adoption in December
2008 for a period up to and including 2020. It will need to look
ahead to the longer-term horizon set out in the Regional Spatial
Strategy.
4. Preparation Process
4.1 A Joint Waste Development Plan Document, like other
Development Plan Documents will need to be prepared in accordance
with the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and associated
statutory regulations. All Development Plan Documents must be
subject to rigorous procedures of community involvement,
consultation and independent examination so as to test the
"soundness" of the document and ensure that the necessary legal
requirements for its preparation have been undertaken. There is
also the need for ongoing Sustainability Appraisal, from the
outset. This will require, in the first instance the preparation of
a scoping report.
4.2 The 2004 Act requires each authority to produce a Local
Development Framework comprising a Core Strategy and a number of
other Development Plan Documents including site-specific
allocations and policies, and area action plans. They are subject
to independent examination and have the status of development plans
as defined by section 38(6) of the Act. Local planning authorities
will be producing Development Plan Documents over the next few
years to meet their statutory requirements. Under the Act two or
more authorities may produce joint Development Plan Documents.
These could include core strategies for their combined areas or
area action plans covering areas that fall across their boundaries
or a joint waste development plan document.
4.3 As with other similar statutory documents, there are four
main stages in the preparation of a Joint Waste Development Plan
Document. These are:
· Stage 1: Pre-production - survey and evidence
gathering;
· Stage 2: Production - preparation of preferred options,
supported by continuous community involvement followed by a six
week period of formal public participation on those options and
then preparation and submission of the Development Plan Document in
the light of representations received;
· Stage 3: Examination - an independent examination into
the soundness of the plan; and
· Stage 4: Adoption - the binding report and adoption
(followed by implementation and monitoring).
4.4
The following diagram is produced by the Office of the Deputy
Prime Minister. It illustrates the process that the Joint Waste
Development Plan Document will need to follow.
4.5 The timetable for the production of Development Plan Documents is set out in Local Development Schemes. An agreement to prepare a West of England Joint Waste Development Plan Document will need to be set out in the Local Development Schemes of each Unitary Authority. An amendment to Local Development Schemes will require with the agreement of the Secretary of State (Government Office for the South West). The Planning Inspectorate will also need to be consulted.
5. Indicative Timeline
5.1 Without resource, procedural and administrative constraints,
it should be possible to achieve adoption of a Joint Waste
Development Plan Document within 24 months, with adoption by early
2008. A more likely minimum preparation period is three years, with
adoption by December 2008, at the earliest taking account of the
time required for "milestone" decisions to be made by each
Authority. An indicative Timeline Project Plan for the preparation
of a West of England Joint Waste Development Plan Document is set
out at Appendix 1. This timetable will need to be kept under
review, and all efforts made to reduce the document preparation
times, without reducing the opportunities for public consultation
and participation.
5.2 In order to achieve adoption by the end of 2008, the Joint
Waste Development Plan Document will need to be project managed.
The role of the Project Manager will reflect the amount of
involvement of consultants in the Project. In the absence of
consultants there would need to be a full time Project Manager. If
consultants were appointed to undertake all the technical work, the
role of the Project Manager would be to facilitate appropriate
liaison between the Project Partners, the Consultants and
Stakeholders, which would allow for the appointment of a part-time
Project Manager.
5.3 In order to ensure that the Project proceeds as speedily as
possible, some of the constituent Authorities may need to amend
standing orders to allow decisions to be made in accordance with
the appropriate statutory regulations concerning decision-making.
The process of preparing a Development Plan Document (DPD) is the
task of the Executive of each Unitary Authority, except in the case
of the following, where decisions would need to be made in Full
Council:
a) approving a DPD for the purposes of submission to the
Secretary of State
b) adopting a DPD
c) amending, modifying, revising, withdrawing or revoking a DPD
unless
i) it is required by the Secretary of State; or
ii) it is authorised by full council when they adopt the
DPD
5.4 Effectively, the process of preparing a Joint Waste
Development Plan Document will commence with the agreement of the
Project Board to recommend to the Unitary Authorities a Project
Brief for the preparation of a Joint Waste Development Plan
Document. When all Authorities agree, each Local Development
Framework will need to be amended. This will require the agreement
of the Government Office of the South West.
5.5 The Indicative Timeline at Appendix 1 assumes that the Waste Studies on Technologies and Waste Planning prepared by Consultants MEL and RPS will form an important part of the initial evidence gathering. These studies, together with the technical evaluation of the Scenarios identified by the Consultants will inform the preparation of the Joint Waste Development Plan Document, at least as far as Municipal Waste is concerned.
5.6 Further work, of a technical nature will need to be
undertaken in order to assess the volumes of wastes arising from
non-municipal sources to be managed in the West of England and the
capacities of existing waste management facilities. This will
involve liaison with the Environment Agency, the agency responsible
for the collection of data on wastes. Updated data from the
Environment Agency is expected shortly.
5.7 Public consultation on a consultation Preferred Options
document commencing December 2006 will follow at least six months
of preparation, including the holding of stakeholder events and
briefings with Members in each Unitary Authority and the Project
Board before being agreed by each Authority. Consultation will need
to reflect the approaches set out in each Statement of Community
Involvement. For the avoidance of doubt, and in order to assist
project management, there would be advantages in preparing a
statement about the way in which consultation on the Preferred
Options Report and the Submission Document will take
place.
5.8 The Indicative Timeline assumes that the West of England
Joint Waste Development Plan Document will be submitted to the
Secretary of State in August 2007. This will be a most important
milestone, and will lead to a Public Examination into the
"soundness" of the Plan during May 2008. Finally, the Joint Waste
Development Plan Document could be adopted by December 2008. It is
assumed that formal work on the submission of planning applications
(including any required Environmental Impact Assessments) would be
submitted by at least the receipt of the Inspector's binding
report, if not earlier.
6. Resources
6.1 Important Project milestones include the preparation for
consultation purposes of a "Preferred Options Report" and a
"Submissions Document". There are significant resource implications
in preparing these documents and undertaking the necessary
statutory procedures and requirements. A Sustainability Appraisal
will also be required, the scoping of which will need to commence
at the start of the Project. There will be a need to prepare for a
Public Examination, which will result in an Inspector's binding
report. Preparation for the Sustainability Appraisal and the Public
Examination will need to be properly resourced.
6.2 The availability of appropriate and skilled staff resources
will be critical to the preparation of the Joint Waste Development
Plan Document. An Officer Steering Group will need to be
established to oversee and, where necessary undertake necessary
technical work, including consultation. The Steering Group will be
representative of all four Unitary Authorities at both planning
management and technical levels and assisted by officers from the
Joint Strategic Planning and Transportation Unit, who will provide
technical and project management support.
6.3 Because there is not sufficient staff resource currently
available to the Unitary Authorities, the need to progress other
development plan documents, including other waste development plan
documents, and the specialist nature of the work, it will be
necessary for a number of essential tasks to be undertaken by
consultants.
6.4 A broad estimate of costs has been undertaken. The main cost
headings are described as follows. Tables 2 and 3 set out a broad
comparison between the two options of employing waste planning
consultants and undertaking most tasks "in-house". The cost of
engaging waste planning consultants to prepare the key documents of
the Joint Waste Development Plan Document and holding four half-day
seminars is estimated to cost £55,000, with a further
£10,000 required for the preparation of a Sustainability
Appraisal (not including the cost of designing and printing
documents).
6.5 Document production and printing the three sets of documents
would be about a further £10,000. The cost of other
consultation activities, facilitated stakeholder events,
e-government and advertisements could be in the order of
£40,000.
6.6 The estimate is based on the Joint Waste Development Plan
Document being a focussed document that will not require further
survey work. However, as noted above further work of a technical
nature will be required and this will include preparing an
up-to-date understanding of the location and function of waste
management facilities that are currently operational and the wastes
arising from non-municipal sources. The estimate also assumes that
existing information sources and analyses, including the
Entec, MEL and RPS waste studies and strategic waste
management assessments prepared by the Environment Agency would
form part of the Evidence Base of the Joint Waste Development Plan
Document.
6.7 Additional costs include preparing for the Public Examination and commissioning expert waste planning and legal representation of say £60,000. The indication from the Planning Inspectorate is that a "small scale" Public Examination of around 10 sitting days could cost in the order of £50,000. The cost of logistics associated with the Examination (hire of accommodation, including appointment of a Programme Officer, printing and advertisement costs) could be of the order of £50,000. Unitary Authority staff costs associated with steering consultants, supporting and possible appearance at the public examination, liaison etc will need to be taken into account. Costs under this heading could be in the order of £75,000.
6.8 The above costs are indicative, at around £400,000 (or £100,000 per Authority), based on preparing a Joint Core Waste Strategy over a period of three years.
Summary of Estimated Costs Option 1 assuming appointment of waste planning consultants Table 2 |
||
Cost of Consultants |
Unitary Authority Costs |
|
Preparation of Joint Waste Development Plan Document |
Cost of Consultants: £55,000 Production (+ printing) of |
Internal Unitary Authority and JSPTU Officer estimated costs
(including meetings of Steering Group): Consultation (other than four seminars), e-government and advertising: £40,000 |
Sustainability Appraisal |
Cost of Consultants: £10,000 |
Unitary Authority and JSPTU Officer Support: |
Project Manager |
(assume two-year part time consultant) £50,000 |
(There is possibility that the Project Manager could be a UA Officer) |
|
Legal Representation and Expert Witnesses: £60,000 |
Logistics, accommodation and Programme Officer: £50,000 |
Estimated Total Costs |
£185,000 |
£215,000 |
Summary of Estimated Costs Option 2 assuming waste planning tasks are Undertaken "in-house" Table 3 |
||
Cost of Consultants |
Unitary Authority Costs |
|
Preparation of Joint Waste Development Plan Document |
|
Internal Unitary Authority and JSPTU Officer estimated costs
(including meetings of Steering Group): Consultation activities, e-government and advertisement: £40,000 Production (+ printing) of |
Sustainability Appraisal |
Unitary Authority and JSPTU Officer - Production: |
|
Project Manager |
(assume two-year full time consultant) £100,000 |
(There is possibility that the Project Manager could be a UA Officer) |
|
Legal Representation and Expert Witnesses: £60,000 |
Logistics, accommodation and Programme Officer: £50,000 |
Estimated Total Costs |
£160,000 |
£270,000 |
6.9 In the absence of consultants it is assumed that the Project
Manager would need to be engaged full time for at least a two-year
period (rather than a three year plan preparation period). This may
need to be extended, as Unitary Authority officers would need to
undertake additional technical work and administrative tasks. It is
also assumed that additional staff resources would be
required.
6.10 No allowance has been made for the initial collection of
data from Unitary Authorities on, for example, existing waste
management facilities and their capacities. Depending on the number
of Officers involved in each of the four Unitary Authorities,
undertaking this survey work, including the GIS (electronic
mapping) and other data handling costs, this work is assumed to
cost about £70,000.
6.11 Given the estimated nature of the above exercise, the cost
of preparing a Joint Waste Core Strategy could be in the range of
£400,000 to £500,000. These costs are indicative, and
will need to be subject to further detailed assessment.
7. Next Steps
7.1 The next step is for the Project Board to recommend a course
of action to each Unitary Authority on the basis of the
recommendations set out in the covering report on the Way Forward
for Waste Planning in the West of England.
7.2 A detailed Project Plan will need to be prepared for the
stages leading to each "milestone", and this will initially require
updating the Project Brief and the detailed assessment of the
resource requirements of reaching each key stage. The Project Plan
will need to identify the linkages with the separate task of
preparing a Joint Municipal Waste Strategy in order to reduce
costs.
7.3 The principal purposes of the Joint Waste Development Plan
Document are to provide a sustainable waste planning framework for
the West of England and the identification of key sites for
strategic waste management capacity. The constituent Local
Development Schemes will need to be amended.
7.4 There will be a need to review the identified three year programme so as to bring forward the required planning guidance in time to progress the procurement / development of the strategic waste management facilities. This will require a number of tasks identified under Appendix 1 to be re-scheduled. This may require additional resource, including Officer time to be identified.