Meeting documents

Cabinet
Wednesday, 7th December, 2005

Bath & North East Somerset Council

MEETING:

Council Executive

DATE:

7 December 2005

PAPER NUMBER

 

TITLE:

Revenue and Capital Budget Monitoring, Cash Limits and Virements

EXECUTIVE FORWARD PLAN REFERENCE:

   

EWP

01190

RP

WARD:

All

AN OPEN PUBLIC ITEM

List of attachments to this report:

Appendix1: Revenue & Capital Monitoring Commentary
Appendix 2:
Revenue Monitoring Statement: All Council Spending
Appendix 3:
Capital Monitoring Statement: All Council Spending
Appendix 4:
Proposed Revenue Virements 2005/06
Appendix 5:
Revised Revenue Portfolio Cash Limits 2005/06
Appendix 6:
Capital Programme Movements 2005/06
Appendix 7:
Revised Capital Portfolio Cash Limits 2005/06

1 THE ISSUE

1.1 This report presents the second quarter budget monitoring position for the Council for the financial year 2005/06 as at the end of September 2005.

1.2 The report also includes a number of budget transfer requests for both revenue and capital that require Council Executive agreement or are reported for information purposes as required by the Budget Management Scheme.

2 RECOMMENDATION

The Council Executive is asked to:

2.1 Note the revenue expenditure and income position for the Council for the financial year to date as at the end of September and the year end projections detailed in Appendices 2 & 3 of this report.

2.2 Confirm the management actions outlined in the report to manage spending within the overall revenue budget for 2005/06.

2.3 Note that the slow down in the capital spending identified to date amounts to £7.9m, slippage in capital income amounts to £5m in 2005/06 and that income from Right to Buy capital receipts is likely to be £1-2m compared to the budgeted £6m. This is consistent in slowing down the programme to available resources and using the opportunity to raise capital receipts to substitute for unsupported borrowing.

2.4 Approve the virements listed in Appendix 4 and note the changes in the capital programme listed in Appendix 6.

2.5 Note the current position of available capital resources and that the review of the capital programme as approved by Council on 17th November 2005 is now underway.

2.6 Approve the allocations from the Headroom capital provision.

3 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

3.1 The financial implications are contained within the body of the report.

4 THE REPORT

4.1 The Budget Management Scheme requires that the Council Executive consider the revenue and capital monitoring position on a quarterly basis.

4.2 The Council's financial position, along with its financial management arrangements and controls are fundamental to continuing to plan and provide services in a managed way. Close monitoring of the financial situation provides information on new risks and pressures in service areas, and appropriate management actions are then identified and agreed to manage and mitigate those risks.

4.3 Where there are projected overspends in the revenue budget, services are expected to seek compensating savings to try and bring budgets back to balance. The Budget Management Scheme states that if overspending occurs it must be recovered.

4.4 Appendix 2 outlines the Council's current revenue financial position for the 2005/06 financial year to the end of September 2005 by portfolio. Appendix 2 shows, with management action, a small potential overspend at this stage of the year of 0.2% of the budget or £300-350k. Appendix 3 outlines the Council's current capital financial position for the same period and shows spend to the end of September 2005 totalling £11.690m or 37% of profiled spend and 19% of forecast spend. This is consistent in slowing down the programme to available resources and using the opportunity to raise capital receipts to substitute for unsupported borrowing.

4.5 Assumptions on the funding of the capital programme for 2005/06 included the receipt of £6m in Right to Buy receipts from Somer Housing and the receipt of a Millennium Commission grant for £5m on practical completion of the Spa scheme. Revised forecasts estimate the actual receipts from Right to Buy sales to be around £1-£2m and the Millennium Commission grant is unlikely until early in the 2006/07 financial year.

4.6 Significant areas of over and under spend are highlighted in Appendix 1, and further explanations of the reasons for over and under spends in the current year are provided within the notes to Appendix 2 (revenue) and Appendix 3 (capital). Management actions are being taken to ensure that, as far as possible, all revenue overspends will be brought into balance by the year end, however, there are clear pressures emerging at an early stage, and these may increase as the year proceeds. The management actions being taken are shown in a table within Appendix 1.

VIREMENT REQUESTS 2005/06

4.7 Revenue budget transfers requiring Council Executive approval are listed in Appendices 4 together with an explanation of why the transfer is necessary.
Appendix 5 indicates the effect upon service and portfolio cash limits if these proposals are approved.

4.8 Changes to the capital programme are listed in Appendix 6, Appendix 7 provides the updated capital programme allocated by portfolio.

4.9 It should be noted that the Council, at its meeting on 17th November 2005, initiated a review of its capital programme and also received reports on the Elderly Persons Homes Programme, the Schools (Major Projects) programme and the Bath Spa project. The decisions are reflected in Appendix 6 and 7.

5 RISK MANAGEMENT

A risk assessment related to the issue and recommendations has been undertaken, in compliance with the Council's decision making risk management guidance.

6 RATIONALE

6.1 The report is presented as part of the reporting of financial management and budgetary control required by the Council.

7 OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED

7.1 None.

8 CONSULTATION

8.1 Consultation has been carried out with the Executive Councillor for Resources, Other B&NES Services, Section 151 Finance Officer, Chief Executive and Monitoring Officer.

Contact person

Richard Szadziewski - 01225 477468
Gary Adams - 01225 477107

Background papers

Budget Management Scheme

Appendix 1

REVENUE BUDGET MONITORING APRIL TO SEPTEMBER 2005

1.1 Appendix 2 outlines the Council's current projected financial position by portfolio for 2005/06 as at the end of September 2005. The Appendix shows, with management action, a small potential overspend at this stage of the year of 0.2% of the budget or £300-350k. The major changes at portfolio level since the report for June 2005 are:

Portfolio

Change (£'000)

Main Reasons

Children's Services

£321

Costs of falling pupil numbers and school reorganisation. Cost pressure in school transport. Increased number of Independent Foster placement.

Social Services

£250

Mental Health financial plan savings target not being achieved

Sustainability & the Environment

-£193

Savings in Planning Services relating to Local Plan and salaries prior to restructuring. Reduction in waste disposal costs through active encouragement of recycling.

Other portfolio's

£54

Details below and in Appendix 2.

Total

£432

 

1.2 Significant areas of over and under spend (including changes from previous reports) are highlighted in this appendix, but further explanations of the reasons for over and under spends in the current year are provided within the notes to Appendix 2.

1.3 Children's Services portfolio - forecast £403,000 over spend

Education Services are predicting a year end overspend of £348,000. The overspend on access has increased to £361,000 due to school transport costs. The main factors are increased costs from an increase in the number of qualifying pupils, the increased number of term days in this financial year and loss of grant funding for transport of 16-19 year olds. The grant changes relate to pathfinder and learning support grants that are paid by DfES and Learning & Skills Council to the LEA to support transport provision for post 16 pupil in schools and colleges. The grants have reduced in 2005/6 compared to 2004/5 by around £17,000. There is a forecast overspend of £206,000 in strategic management due to redundancy costs as a result of schools reorganisation and falling pupil numbers. These overspends are partly offset by underspends in special education (£215,000) due to higher income from recoupment. The balance within Education is made up of a small underspend in non schools funding.

The balance on the portfolio is made up of an underspend of £11,000 in Youth & Community with lower spend on grants to voluntary organisations and an overspend of £66,000 in Social Services Children's Services due to the increased number of independent foster placements.

1.4 Tourism, Leisure & Culture Portfolio - forecast £370,000 over spend

Heritage Services is projecting a surplus of £391,000 less than budgeted for the year. This is due to lower than planned visitor numbers to the Roman Baths and Museum of Costume leading to reduced admission, retail and catering income. The Council Executive has previously decided that surpluses and deficits are ringfenced to Heritage. If the current projection is maintained, it will therefore be necessary for Heritage Services to obtain an advance from Council balances that will be repaid over future years. As part of the service and resource planning process, the Council may need to consider this position and to adjust financial plan targets to reflect "average" years and to permit the service to balance "good" years with "less than average" years.

The balance of the portfolio consists an overspend of £45,000 in Libraries & Information due to savings targets not being achieved and a £66,000 underspend in Leisure Services mainly due to increased income from the cemeteries and crematorium.

1.5 Social Services Portfolio - forecast £290,000 over spend

Adult Services year end forecast is for an overspend of £305,000 due to Mental Health financial planning target savings which will not be achieved. The balance on the portfolio is made up of small underspends within Elderly Persons Homes and Other Social Services.

It should be noted that the relevant executive is considering resuming direct management of relevant social care staff and budgets to restore direct control and accountability and attempt to reduce some of the projected overspend.

1.6 Sustainability & the Environment Portfolio - forecast £166,000 under spend

Planning Services are forecasting a year end underspend of £119,000 due to salary savings in its Planning Policy and Co-ordination & Promotion teams as well as an underspend on Local Plan costs which will now be incurred in 2006/07.

The year end projection for waste services is a £41,000 underspend. This figure consists of the following variances:

Refuse Collection - £59,000 overspend as income from trade waste is declining and the service has to absorb rises in disposal and fuel costs.

Waste Management & Disposal - £200,000 underspend as savings on waste disposal costs are being realised from pursuit of recycling initiatives, including the recruitment of staff at the waste recycling centres to encourage greater sorting of recyclables.

Waste Operations (Transfer & CA Sites) - £100,000 overspend due to cost pressures from maintenance of plant, fuel costs and staffing associated with the recycling initiatives mentioned above.

The balance of the portfolio relates to an underpend of £6,000 in cleansing budgets.

1.7 Directors Group are actively managing the Council's financial position with a view to bringing the reported revenue position for 2005/06 back in to line with budgets by the end of the financial year. The following management actions have been implemented to achieve this:

Social & Housing Services

Action & Service Impact

Estimated Saving (£'000)

Strict vacancy management: Heads of Service only to agree filling/covering vacancies and report monthly through the regular budget and performance indicators meeting, on any they have agreed.

Service Impact: There will be a risk of impact on staff morale, ability to meet PI targets. Heads of Service will assess risk for each post to minimise service impact.

100

A freeze on (non-care related) supplies and services. Exceptions only by agreement of Head of Service or Jane Ashman and reported to the Budget & PI meeting (as above).

Service Impact: This will mean that stocks will be run down and only urgent and exceptional items will be purchased.

80

Continued reinforcement of revised eligibility criteria for services.

Service Impact: This may mean that some service users following a review may cease to receive a service.

50

Panels chaired by Group Manager (or above) to consider all recommendations for residential and nursing care. Further recommendations to be signed-off by the Head of Adult Care & Commissioning.

Service Impact: additional time commitments for senior officers in chairing panels.

50

In addition other options are being considered by the Director of Social and Housing and Executive Member.

Tba

Total

280

Resources Services

Action & Service Impact

Estimated Saving (£'000)

Increased recovery of office accommodation costs to address the overspend forecast for the corporate estate. A charge is levied on the employing service when staff numbers increase.

Service Impact: Services were required to budget for additional accommodation costs from new posts so the impact should be negligible.

71

Total

71

Education and Youth

Action & Service Impact

Estimated Saving (£'000)

Strict vacancy management: Heads of Service only to agree filling/covering vacancies and personnel and Finance monitoring identified savings.

Service Impact: added workload to remaining staff, increasing stress and limiting quality outputs.

50-80

Identification of underspends on school closures. Balances withdrawn from closing schools.

Service Impact: Limited impact due windfall nature of saving.

61
known

Identification of grant underspends and charging full costs to grants.

Service Impact: Reducing outputs of grant activities by restricting coverage of grants amongst curriculum priorities. E.G. less training available for teachers.

95
known

Review of transport routes to identify overlaps.

Service Impact: Limited impact as efficiencies identified, significant workload in identification of efficiency.

30-50

Small purchasing restrictions e.g Equipment replacement delays.

Service Impact: Delays in purchasing may impact outputs of staff. Impact on morale.

10

Standards Fund review to identify alternative provision methodologies.

Service Impact: Reducing outputs of grant activities by restricting coverage of grants amongst curriculum priorities. E.G. less training available for teachers.

50

Total

296-346

Overall Total

644-697

Heritage Services

Savings have been made in staff reductions, negotiated contracts and deferred investment of approximately £300k and further savings have been made elsewhere within Operations, however, as part of the service planning process, the Council may need to adjust future financial plan targets.

1.8 Executive members will be regularly briefed on progress by Directors and given an update in monthly monitoring reports.

CAPITAL BUDGET MONITORING - APRIL TO SEPTEMBER 2005

1.9 On the 22nd February a capital programme of £49.3 million was approved by Council. At the September meeting of the Executive a revised capital budget of £63.95m was reported including slippage of £14.1m from 2004/05. Since the last report the following changes have been incorporated into the programme making the latest capital programme total £63.86m;

 

£'000

Oldfield Outlook Slippage from 2004/05

8

Social Services - Building Safer Communities Grant

52

Education - Specialist Schools Grant

100

Income Sustainability Budget - deleted

-250

   

Total Additions

-90

1.10 Appendix 6 and 7 includes some changes to the capital programme relating to the re-phasing of major project budgets to ensure the 2005/06 budget reflects the latest information on spend profiles. These changes are not reflected in Appendix 3 due to timing issues but will be reflected in future monitoring reports.

1.11 Spend to the 30th September 2005 totalled £11.690m or 37% of profiled spend to end of September of £31,510m. This level of spend equates to 19% of the projected year end spend (£60.96m) and 18% of the current capital budget (£63.86m). Details of the current monitoring position are given in Appendix 3. The revenue capital financing costs will be reviewed as part of the Council's review into the capital programme as agreed by Council at its November meeting.

1.12 Details of revised capital resources are as follows:

 

2005/06
£'000

Total forecast resources

63,202

Less:

 

2005/06 Profiled Spend

60,957

2005/06 carried forward spending

2,901

Resources re-phased to/from future years

-656

1.13 The capital programme for 2005/06 includes a headroom creation scheme budget of £1.4m (including slippage from 2004/05). This funding was earmarked for projects which resulting in efficiencies in Council processes in the future. The following projects are requested to be funded from the Headroom creation scheme budget in 2005/06:-

Corporate Storage Area Network (SAN) = £175k

A Storage Area Network (SAN) is a high speed sub-network of shared storage devices and is a method of removing local storage from servers and holding it as one central pool available to all servers. Due to the scale of server deployments and storage growth in the Council there is a need to implement a large corporate SAN. This would allow the centralization of all storage requirements and provision of storage in a much more efficient manner. Further benefits include reduced need for continual upgrades to the UPS (Uninterrupted Power Supply) and air conditioning systems and the more efficient storage provision reduces hardware costs.

Agresso Project Costing & Billing = £114k

Funding to support the implementation of Project Costing & Billing functionality of the Agresso financial system. The project will lead to increased control and automation of Project Costing and Billing activities, resulting in significantly reduced administrative overheads. The business case was approved by BISDG (Business Improvement Service Development Group) in March 2005 and included payback within 4 years from the identified savings.