Meeting documents
Cabinet
Wednesday, 7th September, 2005
Sheet1
Formula Grant Consultation Paper - Exemplification effects of options on B&NES |
Appendix 2 |
|||||
Option |
Description of Option |
Change in Grant / FSS |
Impact of option £m |
Best £m |
Worst £m |
% |
Education |
||||||
SCLT1 |
Total transfer out of schools spend 2005/06 - £95m |
Grant |
1.7920 |
1.7920 |
6.1% |
|
SCLT2 |
Customised Damping |
Grant |
1.0370 |
1.0370 |
3.6% |
|
Education Non Schools |
||||||
EDU1 |
Update Sparsity data using 2001 Census |
FSS |
-0.0810 |
-0.0810 |
-0.1% |
|
EDU2 |
Removing direct funding of residual college lecturer pensions |
FSS |
-0.0860 |
-0.0860 |
-0.1% |
|
EDU3 |
Removing Local Education Authority (LEA) damping block |
FSS |
0.0300 |
0.0300 |
0.0% |
|
Social Services - Children |
||||||
SSC1 |
New deprivation top up |
FSS |
-0.5800 |
-0.5800 |
-0.6% |
|
SSC2 |
Foster Cost Option |
FSS |
-0.1240 |
-0.1240 |
-0.1% |
|
SSC3 |
Use of better indicator data |
FSS |
-0.1300 |
-0.1300 |
-0.1% |
|
Social Services - Elderly |
||||||
SSE1 |
Age & Deprivation based on "need for care" |
FSS |
-0.3230 |
-0.3230 |
-0.3% |
|
SSE2 |
Age & Deprivation based on "small area data" |
FSS |
0.0130 |
0.0% |
||
SSE3 |
Age & Deprivation - "low income adjustment" |
FSS |
0.1580 |
0.1580 |
0.2% |
|
SSE4 |
Sparsity adjustment based on population 65+ |
FSS |
-0.0300 |
-0.0300 |
0.0% |
|
SSE5 |
Sparsity adjustment based on distance measure |
FSS |
-0.0070 |
-0.0070 |
0.0% |
|
Social Services - Younger Adults |
||||||
SSA1 |
Cost of providing younger adult Social Services per 1000 people aged 18-64 |
FSS |
-0.7370 |
-0.7370 |
-0.8% |
|
SSA2 |
No of clients per 1000 inhabitants aged 18-64 |
FSS |
-1.6840 |
-1.6840 |
-1.7% |
|
Highways Maintenance |
||||||
HM1 |
Moving to 3 Year average traffic flows |
FSS |
0.0900 |
0.0900 |
0.1% |
|
HM2 |
Updated net in-commuters from 2001 census |
FSS |
-0.0790 |
-0.0790 |
-0.1% |
|
HM3 |
Adding back lanes to formula |
FSS |
0.0000 |
0.0% |
||
EPCS |
||||||
EPCS1 |
Update density, sparsity, net in-commuters and country of birth stats - 2001 census |
FSS |
0.1290 |
0.1290 |
0.1% |
|
EPCS2 |
Re-weighting density, pensioners on income support & incapacity benefit/severe disability allowance individuals with a view to move from half fare to full free fare scheme |
FSS |
0.7700 |
0.7700 |
0.8% |
|
Flood Defence |
||||||
FD1 |
Transfer of Critical Ordinary Watercourses (COWs) |
FSS |
-0.0140 |
-0.0140 |
0.0% |
|
Fixed Costs |
||||||
FC1 |
Update Fixed Cost Element to £325k from £300k |
FSS |
-0.0040 |
-0.0040 |
0.0% |
|
Capital Financing |
||||||
CF1 |
Abolish both interest receipts elements from FSS |
FSS |
2.6610 |
2.6610 |
2.8% |
|
CF2 |
As CF1 and reduce capital FSS by equivalent amount |
FSS |
0.3260 |
0.3260 |
0.3% |
|
CF3 |
As CF1 and reduce the non capital FSS by the equivalent amount |
FSS |
0.6420 |
0.7% |
||
Area Cost Adjustment (ACA) |
||||||
ACA1 |
Labour Cost Adjustment - Expanded data ASHE |
FSS |
0.2410 |
0.2410 |
0.3% |
|
ACA2 |
Rates Cost Adjustment - Removing Rates Cost Adjustment |
FSS |
0.0280 |
0.0280 |
0.0% |
|
ACA3 |
Rates Cost Adjustment - Update weightings |
FSS |
0.0150 |
0.0150 |
0.0% |
|
ACA4 |
Geography - raise lower limit of ACA (only include those areas with higher than average wage cost pressures) |
FSS |
-1.1940 |
-1.1940 |
-1.2% |
|
ACA5 |
Geography - keep lower limit at the same level |
FSS |
0.0540 |
0.0540 |
0.1% |
|
Resource Equalisation |
||||||
RE1 |
Full additional resource equalisation |
Grant |
-1.4950 |
-1.4950 |
-1.4% |
|
RE2 |
Half additional resource equalisation |
Grant |
-0.7380 |
-0.7380 |
-0.7% |
|
RE3 |
Full additional resource equalisation & abolish interest receipts |
Grant |
-0.9540 |
-0.9% |
||
Floor Damping |
||||||
DMP1 |
Abolition of the capital adjustment |
Grant |
0.0070 |
0.0% |
||
DMP2 |
Damping based on tax base |
Grant |
-0.4540 |
-0.4540 |
-0.4% |
|
DMP3 |
Damping based on basic amount per head |
Grant |
0.0530 |
0.0530 |
0.0% |
|
Total variation possible |
4.271 |
-4.647 |
||||
FSS |
= Formula Spending Share - Government Formula based way of allocating grant to Local Authorities to pay for services |
|||||
The above list relates to technical options that are proposed in the paper. Shown are the options with the best and worst financial outcomes for this authority. It is also possible that no changes are made to some areas. |