Meeting documents
Cabinet
Wednesday, 6th December, 2006
Bath &
North East
Somerset Council
|
||||
MEETING: |
Council
Executive |
|||
MEETING
DATE: |
6 December
2006 |
AGENDA ITEM
NUMBER |
17 |
|
TITLE: |
Bath &
North East
Somerset's Draft Local Area
Agreement |
EXECUTIVE
FORWARD PLAN REFERENCE: |
||
E |
1538 |
|||
WARD: |
All
|
|||
AN OPEN PUBLIC ITEM
|
||||
List of
attachments to this report: Appendix 1: Draft Principles for pooling and aligning
resources into the LAA Appendix 2: Draft Governance
Arrangements for the LAA |
||||
1 THE
ISSUE
1.1 The report
sets out currentprogress made on pooling and aligning resources for
the Local Area Agreement,and on governance arrangements to ensure
its effective implementation.
2 RECOMMENDATION
The
Council Executive is asked to agree that:
2.1 The
draft principles for pooling and aligning resources in the LAA,
setout in Appendix One, be adopted for the
purpose of developing the first year ofthe
LAA
2.2 The
Local
Strategic Partnership and LAA Project
Board be invited to undertakemore detailed work on the draft
Governance Arrangements for the LAA set out in Appendix 2
2.3 The second
draft of theLocal Area Agreement be brought to the Council
Executive on 10thJanuary, and that this:
(1)
Identifies pooled andaligned resources, with clear links
to the Financial Plan
(2) Sets
out in particular howthe LAA will align resources available for the
following key outcomes:
§ Improving
the quality of the local environment
§ Tackling
climate change
3 FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS
3.1
Bath &
North East Somerset'sfirst Local Public Service Agreement (LPSA)
attracted £920,000 in pump-primingfunds into the area and it
is expected that significant performance rewardgrant will also be
gained. Similar sums will potentially be available throughthe LAA,
now that the "reward" element has been incorporated into theLAA
process. The Council Executive has earmarked £50,000 from PSA
performancereward grant to `pump-prime' the development of the
LAA. The Local Area Agreement provides anopportunity to pool
and align resource streams to improve outcomes, and thisreport sets
out draft principles for progressing this approach.
4 Community
Strategy Outcomes
4.1 The
report to the Council Executive in September 2006 set out in
detailhow the emerging LAA framework contributes to the Community
Strategy ambitions.The Community Strategy ambitions to be addressed
through the LAA are set below:
· Promoting
a 'sense of place'so people identify with and take pride in our
communities
· Celebrating
thecontributions people from different backgrounds and with
different experiencescan make, and promoting equality of
opportunity
· Sharing
resources, workingtogether, and finding new ways of doing
things
· Building
communities wherepeople feel safe and secure
· Taking
responsibility forour environment and natural resources now and
over the long term
· Improving
our localtransport
· Improving
our housingsituation for local people
· Improving
localopportunities for learning and gaining
skills
· Improving
our local economy
· Improving
our localenvironment
· Improving
our local healthand social care
5 CORPORATE
IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES
5.1 The
report to the Council Executive on September set out in detail
howthe emerging LAA framework contributes to the Corporate Plan
improvement ambitions,as follows:
· Reducing
fear of crime
· Promoting
independence ofolder people
· Improving
life chances fordisadvantaged teenagers
· Improving
the environmentfor learning
· Cultural
Development
· Reducing
Landfill
· Increase
in AffordableHousing
· Improving
the Quality ofPublic Transport/Roads/Pavements and easing
congestion
· Developing
a sustainableeconomy
· Improving
the public realm
· Improving
customer satisfaction
6 CPA
KEY lines of enquiry
6.1 The
LAA blocks contribute significantly to the CPA key lines of
inquiryset out below:
· Ambition
for the community -i.e. What the council, together with its
partners, is trying to achieve - the LAA outcome framework
isdriven by Community Strategy ambitions
· Prioritisation
of ambitions-work onstretch targets
is based on the prioritisation of ambitions
· Increasing
capacity of thecouncil to deliver ambition for the Community to
ensure we achieve what we saywe will- theLAA focuses on
building capacity in particular under the stronger
communitiestheme
· Managing
performance ofcommunity ambition to ensure we achieve what we say
we will- the LAA will be subject toclear performance management
· Creating
and developing abetter quality of life for the area
through
o
Sustainable Communities and Transport
o Safer
and Stronger Communities
o
Healthier Communities
(These outcomes are set outunder the relevant blocks in the LAA
draft)
· Improving
engagement withand a range of services for Older People and
Children and Young People
(This outcome is set outunder the relevant blocks)
7 the
report
7.1 The
Executive in October received a report containing the first
draftLocal Area Agreement submitted to Government Office. The
Executive requestedthe LAA Project
Board to:
(1) Undertake
work on options for the potential alignment and pooling of
resourcestreams to ensure delivery of the LAA
(2) Consider
options for the detailed governance arrangements for theperformance
management of the Local Area Agreement
(3) Report
back to the Council Executive on the outcomes of this work
inDecember 2006
7.2 The
Project Board held a Workshop on 3rd November, toexamine
in detail how the Local Agreement can help "pool" and "align"
resourcein order to ensure that the resources available locally to
public agenciessecure agreed outcomes. The workshop, facilitated by
the Local GovernmentImprovement and Development Agency, heard that
Local Area Agreements identifyexisting sources of resource that
help meet agreed targets. These funds are oftwo
types:
(1) "Pooled"
resources. This occurs where organisations agree to bringtogether a
range of funds that meet a common goal into one budget. In
thesecases, individual organisations usually work through a joint
body that agreeshow resources should be allocated. There are a
number of effective examples ofsuch pooled resources locally, such
as for the drugs and alcohol service.
(2) "Aligned"
resources. This approach, used extensively in existing LocalArea
Agreements, highlights in the LAA document the funds that are
available tomeet an outcome, and usually establishes a shared
planning framework wherepartners agree to work together. However,
unlike with "pooled" budgets,individual organisations continue to
hold the funds directly and agree only towork together as
appropriate. This is often seen as a useful approach to buildtrust
and confidence in joint working at the start of the LAA
process.
7.3 The
LAA
Project Board workshop considered in
detail these variousapproaches, and the Board has now worked up a
series of principles to guide howpooled and aligned budgets might
work within the LAA, building on good practicein Bath & North
East Somerset and elsewhere. The principles also addresskey issues
such as risk management and democratic accountability through
electedmembers. These principles are attached as Appendix One. The principles stressthat for any
pooled budgets, distinct arrangements must be in place
inorder to assess and manage risk and to ensure clear
accountability. Alignedbudgets also provide the potential
for partners to highlight theircontributions to shared goals and
forge a basis for improved joint working.Each of these approaches
present different risks which must be managedappropriately through
following the agreed principles.
7.4 Some
Government resource streams are "centrally pooled" into the
LAA,allowing a degree of local flexibility over how they are
deployed. For thesefunds, appropriate outcomes and indicators have
to be agreed through the LAAprocess. Additionally, it must be noted
that, in general, centrally "pooled" resourcestreams have already
been allocated to, or committed against, the delivery ofidentified
services or projects.
7.5 In
addition to these existing funds, the Local Area Agreement
attracts"pump-priming" funds, which must be spent specifically on
achieving stretchtargets.
7.6 Pooled
or aligned budgets require that robust "governance arrangements"are
in place. These ensure that performance is managed, that
transparency andaccountability are maintained, and that elected
members roles are fullyreflected. However, strengthened governance
arrangements will be requiredbecause the LAA is delivered by a wide
range of partners, working togetherthrough the Local Strategic
Partnership.
7.7 The
LAA Project Board and Local Strategic
Partnership have considered how the existingframeworks for
partnership working in Bath & North East Somerset can
bedeveloped further. The approach taken has been to identify and
clarify keyroles that will need to be undertaken in the delivery
and review phases of the LAA.The key roles are as
follows:
(1) "Governance
"or "Board" roles, designed to ensure accountability to
partnerorganisations and to local communities. This would allow for
links, forexample, with local partnership bodies.
(2) High-level
"block lead" roles for each of the Local Area
AgreementBlocks
(3) Partnership
and delivery body roles
7.8 These
roles, as proposed by the LAA Project Board, are set out in
moredetail in Appendix 2 of this report, and
the LAA Project Board and LSP will beundertaking more detailed work
on structures. Any structure will be supportedby a clear
performance management framework whereby performance data will
bereported to partners, officers and members in good time to take
appropriateaction to deliver agreed performance, "escalating" as
necessary to theappropriate partner organisations. Discussions with
partners are currentlyunderway on how best to develop this
proposal, which would also entailstrengthening the LSP Board
potentially to include wider links to localcommunities. Detailed
work on roles, potential memberships and operatingarrangements for
the LAA governance structure are taking place, includingproposals
to
§ Reconfigure
the LSP Board to ensure widergovernance representation and
strengthen links with local communities and thevoluntary and
community sector
§ Clarify
the bodies responsible for deliveringLAA outcomes, with key roles
and common terms of reference developed
§ Create
of protocols to manage theserelationships and ensure effective
performance management
7.9 In
order to support these roles, including those of elected
members,work is underway with the four unitary authorities to
develop a proposal forthe Government's "Capacity Building Fund",
which would provide for some of thetraining and development needed
to ensure these new roles are fully
supported.
7.10It
is important to note that elected member roles are crucial to
thedevelopment and delivery of the LAA. As well as Executive member
roles, workingwith partners to deliver the LAA, the Overview and
Scrutiny process will play akey role in challenge, performance
management and scrutiny of the LAA. TheCorporate Issues and
Partnership Overview and Scrutiny Panel agreed at itsmeeting of
21st September agreed that each Overview and Scrutiny Panel
shouldbe responsible for scrutiny of appropriate block outcomes.
Any further work ondeveloping Overview and Scrutiny roles will of
course be driven by Overview andScrutiny itself, working with the
Chairs' Group. It is also suggested that aseries of member
workshops be held in order to gain feedback on the
approachesoutlined in Appendix 2. As part of
the LAA engagement process, the relevantextracts from the LAA have
been presented to Overview and Scrutiny Panels
asfollows:
§ Housing
and Community Safety Overview and Scrutiny Panel,
9thNovember
§ Health
and Social Services Overview and Scrutiny Panel,
10thNovember
§ Major
Projects Overview and Scrutiny Panel, 21st
November
§ Education,
Youth, Culture and Leisure Overview and Scrutiny Panel,
27thNovember
§ Corporate
Issues and Partnerships Overview and Scrutiny Panel,
30thNovember
§ Resources
Overview and Scrutiny Panel, 12th December
7.11The
reports to these Panels also highlight the key issuesarising from
GOSW feedback on the LAA. In general, GOSW feedback has
beenpositive. The feedback praises the way in which the LAA process
has been usedas an opportunity to strengthen links with local
communities and the voluntarysector, the recognition of the
importance of performance management to theeffective
implementation of the LAA, and the positive commitment
totackling equalities issues through the LAA. As well as detailed
comments on targets, GOSW alsosuggest that the next
stage of the LAA should focus on making moreexplicit the links
between the blocks. In particular, GOSW have statedthey would
welcome the inclusion in the LAA of a clear approach to
thetargeting of specific neighbourhoods on the basis of
differentiated need.
7.12As
part of the LAA process, a so-called "enabling measure" has
beendeveloped to help improve the way in which the performance is
reported in thearea of health and social care. This isdesigned to
help with plans for Council and PCT integration, focussing on
acommon assessment framework to deliver clear improvements in
health and socialcare outcomes.
7.13The
LAA Project Board will continue to co-ordinate work on the LAA anda
further report will be brought to the Executive in January 2007
with thesecond draft LAA for determination. The finalised LAA
document will be agreedin February 2007, linked to the Council's
Financial Plan. The LAA lasts forthree years, with an annual
"refresh".
8 RISK
MANAGEMENT
8.1 The report
author and LeadExecutive member have fully reviewed the risk
assessment related to the issueand recommendations, in compliance
with the Council's decision making riskmanagement guidance. The LAA
Project has been subject to risk
assessmentprocedures.
9 RATIONALE
9.1 Bath &
North EastSomerset Council is the accountable body for the LAA and,
through its CommunityLeadership role, has a key interest in
ensuring that the emerging LAA governanceframework is robust.
10
OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED
10.1
None
11
CONSULTATION
11.1Executive
councillor, Parish council, Town council, Overview &Scrutiny
Panel, Trades unions, Other B&NES Services, Local
residents,Community Interest Groups, Youth Council,
Stakeholders/Partners, Other publicsector bodies, Section 151
Finance Officer, Chief Executive, Monitoring
Officer
11.2Significant
engagement withpartners and local communities has taken place on
the development of the LAA. A statement of community involvement
for theLAA is available here
12
ISSUES TO CONSIDER INREACHING THE DECISION
Social Inclusion; CustomerFocus; Sustainability; Young People;
Equality (age, race, disability,religion/belief, gender, sexual
orientation); Corporate; Other LegalConsiderations
13
ADVICE SOUGHT
13.1
The Council's MonitoringOfficer (Council Solicitor) and
Section 151 Officer (Resources Director) havehad the opportunity to
input to this report and have cleared it forpublication. Advice has
also been sought from the Director-level sponsor forthe LAA and
from Strategic Directors.
Contact
person |
Andy Thomas
- 01225 394322 |
Background
papers |
Local Area
Agreements - Guidance for Round Three and Refresh of Rounds One and
Two, ODPM
Bath &
North East
Somerset's Draft Local Area
Agreement: Update, Report to Council
Executive, 6th
September 2006 |
Please contact the
report author if you need to access this report in an alternative
format |
APPENDIX ONE: Pooling andAligning
Resources: Draft Principles developed by LAA Project
Board
UNDERLYING APPROACH
- Build on good
practice from existing pooled and aligned
budgets
- Commit to building
trust through effective governance arrangements, ensuring links are
made with staff at all levels
- Develop joint
planning and data to further take forward the LAA and make best use
of local resources
- The focus for pooling
and aligning budgets should be on agreed local outcomes
- There should be
clarity about lines of accountability for discussing and agreeing
how the resources can best deliver the outcome- eg, a partnership
or other group with transparent
representation
- There should be
transparency of decision-making through a shared performance
management system
- There must be links
back through Governance representation to the body from which the
resource emanates
- There must be
appropriate levels of elected member involvement, through
executive, Overview and Scrutiny, Member Champion and local
community leadership roles
Pooling budgets requirerisk to be managed in a
different way, and it is therefore suggested that
followingadditional elements be put in place for pooled
budgets:
- A risk-management
process should be undertaken and arrangements for managing risk put
in place. This could include, where proportionate, formal
risk-sharing arrangements.
- There should be
dedicated finance officer support in order to understand other
agencies' financial systems
- Locally set financial
rules and procedures should be in place
- Where appropriate a
formal legal basis for pooling should be
agreed
These
shouldbe formally agreed to by each organisation through their
governancearrangements
APPENDIX TWO:
DraftGovernance Arrangements for the Local Area
Agreement
Thekey building
blocks for the LAA governance and performance
managementarrangements are:
- Effective performance
management systems within the Council, using our QPR reporting
tool. Work is currently underway to link this system with the PCT
and other agencies to provide a platform for LAA
reporting.
- Effective partnership
working, through the Local Strategic
Partnership and delivery
Partnerships for the blocks including for Community Safety,
Children and Young People and Health
- Key roles for elected
members in their Executive, local community leadership, Member
Champion and Overview and Scrutiny roles
Thekey emerging roles
are set out below:
The
Local
Strategic Partnership |
|||
Body |
LSP
Board |
LSP/LAA
Delivery Group |
LSA/LAA
Delivery Bodies |
Role |
Wider
Strategic/governance Role Community
representation role Champion
the LAA and ensure delivery of the Stronger Communities
Block |
LAA
Block Leads Address
issues in delivery and report to Board. |
Delivery
of the LAA blocks, reporting to the Delivery Group and raising key
issues for resolution. |
Principle of
Representation |
Governance
representatives, e.g. elected members, 'non-executives', community
representatives |
Senior
- level organisational leadership in partner organisations who are
leading on the LAA Blocks |
|
Thiswould require a
reconfiguration of LSP working to ensure a split between
the"governance", to operate through an LSP Board, and the
"delivery" mechanisms,to operate through a series of groups and
partnerships which would be broughttogether through "Block Leads"
under an LSP LAA Delivery Board. Theinter-relationships between
these bodies are based on a clear "ladder ofaccountability"
accountability set out in the diagram overleaf.