Meeting documents
Cabinet
Wednesday, 6th December, 2006
Appendix A
SUMMARYBUDGET
FORECASTS
-
The indicative summary
budget forecasts shown below reflect the anticipated costs that
have been identified to date for the JRMWMS and JWPD projects. In
respect of the Joint Procurement exercise, some broad cost
estimates have also been included to give an indication of the
scale of costs that may potentially arise. These costs will be
finalised in the Service plan for 07/08.
-
The Project Board has
recommended that costs of the project be shared equally amongst the
UAs during the Strategy and Joint Waste
Development Plan process, and apportioned on the basis of residual
waste arisings in each authority during
the procurement process based on annual returns submitted under the
statutory reporting database, WasteDataFlow.
INDICATIVESUMMARY BUDGET
FORECASTS AS AT 24/11/06
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project |
2005/06 |
2006/07 |
2007/08 |
2008/09 |
2009/10 |
2010/11 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint Municipal Waste
Management Strategy |
36,500 |
289,000 |
239,250 |
|
|
|
564,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint Development Plan
Document |
|
194,200 |
308,000 |
160,000 |
389,300 |
|
1,051,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint Waste
Procurement |
|
|
200,000 |
1,350,000 |
907,500 |
540,500 |
2,998,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
totals |
36,500 |
483,200 |
747,250 |
1,510,000 |
1,296,800 |
540,500 |
4,614,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apportionment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B&NES |
9,125 |
120,800 |
168,813 |
256,000 |
242,525 |
86,480 |
883,743 |
|
|
BCC |
9,125 |
120,800 |
216,813 |
580,000 |
460,325 |
216,200 |
1,603,263 |
|
|
SGC |
9,125 |
120,800 |
180,813 |
337,000 |
296,975 |
118,910 |
1,063,623 |
|
|
NSC |
9,125 |
120,800 |
180,813 |
337,000 |
296,975 |
118,910 |
1,063,623 |
|
|
|
36,500 |
483,200 |
747,250 |
1,510,000 |
1,296,800 |
540,500 |
4,614,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Joint Waste
Procurement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated process
costs only - from GLA report (PPP route) |
||||||||
|
Detail and profile to
be worked up through PID and Planning process |
|
|||||||
|
in conjunction with
4ps, Jacobs Babtie and
Capita-Symonds |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST APPORTIONMENT
The
following is anextract of the minutes from the member project board
meeting 26th September
2006:
|
Note: Cost
Apportionment Recommendations (Member Project Board 26th
September) |
|
|
|
||||
|
(i) Since the production of the Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy and the Waste Development Plan Document have equal benefit to all four partnering UAs, the apportionment during the time when these documents are being prepared should remain on an equal four way split.
|
|||||||
|
(ii) At the point at which the process of procurement commences, the apportionment be adjusted, based on the quantity of Directly Landfilled Municipal Waste to better represent the nature of the task ahead and to reflect the efforts each authority is taking to reduce the volumes of residual waste and to provide an incentive to do so.
|
|||||||
|
To be agreed on the basis that there will
be an annual review of the percentage apportionment by Directly
Landfilled Waste, with a retrospective
adjustment based on the actual audited WasteDataFlow (WDF) figures from the Environment
Agency. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table to illustrate
indicative percentage apportionment, based on 2005/06 WDF
data |
|
|
|
||||
|
Authority |
Directly
Landfilled MSW (tonnes, 2005/06)
|
Apport-ionment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B&NES |
63,409 |
16% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bristol |
153,439 |
40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Somerset |
86,461 |
22% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Gloucestershire |
83,699 |
22% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
387,008 |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|