Meeting documents

Cabinet
Wednesday, 6th December, 2006

APPENDIX A

West of England Working Group for the 2012 Games

Business Case

1 The Issue

1.1 The run up to the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games offers a unique opportunity to generate long term benefits for communities, sporting and cultural organisations and for business. National and regional structures have been put in place to lead and co-ordinate the work required to prepare for the games and these bodies will work with county (i.e. sub-regionally) based bodies bidding to be involved.

1.2 The West of England Working Group has been formed to represent key partner organisations and lead on the work required to maximise the benefits of the Games to the sub-region.

1.3 This paper sets out the outline plan to maximise the opportunities presented by 2012 in the period leading up to the event and to ensure that the sub-region achieves lasting legacy community and economic benefits.

1.4 This paper also sets out the necessary infrastructure which will provide the platform to seize these opportunities and proposes how such an approach can be resourced.

2 Recommendations

2.1 It is recommended that:

2.1.1 The Working Group adopts the outline approach set out in this paper

2.1.2 The partner organisations represented on the Working Group commit to the principles and funding obligations set out in this paper

2.1.3 That the West of England Working Group be asked to confirm local authority funding as proposed at paragraph 8.3.

2.1.4 That the Chief Executive of the West of England Partnership be requested to act as budget holder for the cost items shown in paragraph 8.1 (1) - ref paragraph 8.4.

2.1.5 There is a need to confirm what proportion of the costs incurred in section 8.1 (2) require additional funding and how these will be contributed to by the remaining partners - ref paragraph 8.4.

3 Background

3.1 The announcement that London will host the Olympics in 2012 offers a unique opportunity for the sub-region. The area is ideally positioned to secure commercial advantage and lasting benefits from the Olympics with a cultural, sporting and economic offering which can attract funding, global media attention and international athletes.

3.2 There is strong competition from other counties and regions so representatives of relevant organisations across the sub-region have acted swiftly to establish an approach that will promote the interests of the area in a concerted, co-ordinated way.

4 Objectives and Actions

4.1 The objectives of the West of England Working Group for the 2012 Games are set out at Appendix A ("A Sub-regional Vision for the Olympic Legacy"). In order that these objectives are achieved, the Working Group has identified three key areas for action:

4.1.1 Increased participation in sport improves health, reduces crime and improves community spirit. The Group will promote the value of activity at all levels, through schools programmes, volunteer opportunities and cultural festivals and seek to do what is required to improve standards of sporting performance.

4.1.2 Enormous demand for goods and services will be generated by 2012. The Group will ensure business is in the best position to take advantage of all the available opportunities.

4.1.3 People will be drawn from around the world to the Games. The Group will develop an attractive portfolio drawing attention to the many attributes which make the West of England such a tremendous place to live, visit, work and do business and which offers the scope to stage major sporting, cultural and commercial events.

4.2 A detailed and costed project plan and action plans to achieve these objectives will be developed once the necessary resources are in place.

5 Benefits

5.1 The whole nation is geared to the ambitious Olympics 2012 project. It will require 70,000 volunteers alone to stage the opening and closing ceremonies and manage people flows.

5.2 There is a need to select, develop and train a generation of young people. This will create a pyramid of ability which will yield the champions of the future. The nation has set a target to double the number of high performance athletes of European, Commonwealth or Olympic standard. The sub-region has an enviable record of achievement in this area. Appendix B sets out some specific benefits of attracting national teams to the area.

Sport

5.3 The development of sport could have a lasting impact upon the sub-region. In order to yield the high performance athletes of the future, there will be selection and coaching programmes involving schools, clubs and the workplace to create a pyramid of ability.

5.4 The sub-region is well positioned (in geographical and infrastructure terms) to provide training facilities which will allow visiting teams to become acclimatised during the five preceding years commencing 2007. Before then large numbers of advisors will evaluate each regional venue offering sports training facilities.

Economy

5.5 The economic impact to the region is difficult to assess but the Training and Holding Camp on the Gold Coast claim that the region benefited from the Sydney Olympics by the following amounts up to March 2005:

A$400 million (£170m) in contracts and additional tourist revenue (against an overall projected A$50 million(£21m) income in the original business plan)

The equivalent of A$700 million(£300m) destinational publicity

5.6 No single sports facility in the UK can hope to host a complete Olympic team or groups of Olympic teams in training because of the need to cope with 28 sports, many requiring specialist venues. Nonetheless facilities within the sub-region could, with investment, strive for a substantial share of this.

5.7 Hotels, caterers, retailers and local businesses will all benefit so it will be vital that the business sector is fully involved.

5.8 With a suitable framework, adequate resources and careful planning, benefits to the sub-region will include:

i. Boosting the local economy through participation in the programme of cultural and sporting events leading up to 2012.

ii. Gaining inward investment to create a long-term legacy in sporting infrastructure.

iii. Raising the international profile of the sub-region.

iv. Increasing the number of visitors and the length of their stay in the area.

v. Increasing participation in sport and active lifestyles.

vi. Boosting the local economy through hosting elite athletic teams and their entourage from the UK and abroad both before and during the event.

vii. Benefits associated with selecting, developing and training local young people with the potential to become Olympic champions.

6 Partnership Arrangements & Governance

6.1 Structures for organising the Games are in place at national and regional level and these bodies will only engage with groups representing sub-regions (counties).

6.2 The Games will incorporate the Olympics and Paralympics and will sit alongside a cultural programme which will include a series of sporting and cultural events held around the country in the years leading up to 2012.

6.3 Nationally, the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (LOCOG) will organise, publicise and stage the Games whilst the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) will manage the public investment in venues and infrastructure.

6.4 Regionally, Regional development Authorities (RDAs) will support Olympics related initiatives in their regions. They will be supported by the Nations and regions committee, a sub-committee of LOCOG.

6.5 The South West Regional Development Agency (SWRDA), in conjunction with Sport England South West and the Government Office of the South West (GOSW), has established a regional office to maximise the legacy opportunities from the Games. Their Executive group is advised by a wider group (chaired by Ged Roddy from the University of Bath) encompassing representation from businesses, trades unions, local authorities, sporting bodies and others. The Executive is represented at national level on the Nations and Regions committee.

6.6 The proposed regional structure requires that primary contacts be between the region and sub-regional bodies based on county areas (7 in the south west).

6.7 Sub-regionally, the intention is to mirror the regional structure with a Working Group operating as an executive which manages resources to achieve the vision and for this team to be advised and supported by a wider group of stakeholders.

6.8 The Working Group in this sub-region ("West of England Working Group for the 2012 Games") is made up of:

Don Foster MP (Chair)

West of England Strategic Partnership (Chief Executive)

Bath & North East Somerset Council (Executive Member)

Bristol City Council (Executive Member)

North Somerset Council (Executive Member)

South Gloucestershire Council (Executive Member)

Business West

Wesport (County Sports Partnership) (Partnership Director)

University of Bath

University of Bristol

6.9 The Working Group will appoint staff who will deliver the work to maximise the benefits to the sub-region and report to the Chief Executive of the West of England Strategic Partnership. This may involve either directly employing staff or seconding staff from the partner organisations. A detailed Project Plan will be developed and agreed by the Working Group.

6.10 The wider stakeholder group is intended to represent, for example:

The business sector (i.e. Chambers of Commerce)

Other universities, colleges, schools

Sporting bodies, including representatives of disabled people

Cultural bodies

Trades unions

The media

Health

Education

Tourism sector

The Emergency Services

6.11 The role of these groups will be to identify and exploit future prospects. These are likely to include:

Forging links with the regional organisation and overseas teams to identify the needs for training camps and resulting commercial opportunities.

Encouraging a new form of sports tourism to build upon the sub-region's long history of welcoming overseas visitors particularly from the USA, Japan and Europe.

Gaining funding to expand and upgrade current sporting provision within the area.

Investigating how the region might support the national Olympic effort through local training facilities. Similar issues to the main Olympic bid will need to be addressed including coaching, accommodation, security, transport links and provision forParalympians.

Identifying, selecting and training local youngsters so that they reach the peak of their performance curve in 2012. In the main, these future British athletes are now in the age range 11 - 25.

Seeking new research opportunities in the field of sport so as to establish the sub-region as a leading centre in the knowledge economy thereby generating employment opportunities.

Adapting the skills and offerings of businesses in the sub-region in order to maximise commercial opportunities

Ensuring that the sub-region gains significant and lasting cultural benefits from this involvement

7 Costs / Investment Required

7.1.1 Investment is essential if the sub-region is to be successful in maximising the benefits of the Games.

7.1.2 Some progress has been made to date, including the setting up of the Working Group, securing web domains and preparations for a public launch in July 2006 including the creation of materials supporting the initiative.

7.2 There will be a need to employ a team (initially two people) who can carry out the work associated with delivering the aspirations of the sub-region. Costs will be incurred and it is essential (before further progress is made) to establish a budget and funding for this work. Not all partners will be in a position to fund this initiative but it is anticipated that, wherever possible, costs will be minimised through each partner represented on the Working Group assisting with delivering plans through the provision of "in kind" services.

7.3 An outline estimate of costs only is possible until the necessary staff are employed to work up detailed plans. It is also not possible to be fully clear about sources of funding until the resources are in place to establish what might be made available by various bodies.

7.4 It is proposed that the costs of this work are met by the three sectors forming the partnership (i.e. local authorities, businesses and universities).

7.5 The scale of the investment will need to increase as 2012 approaches and is estimated as follows for the first 3 years:

Year 1 (2006/07) £198K

Year 2 (2007/08) £214K

Year 3 (2008/09) £230K

7.6 This estimate is broken down as follows:

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

£k £k £k

Staffing Costs 70 70 70

Marketing, Travel, Accommodation 20 30 40

Marketing materials, web design & host,

advocate, delivery 60 65 70

IT equipment, infrastructure & support 12 12 12

Office space, equipment 12 12 12

Hosting visitors 12 13 14

Financial & budgetary control 12 12 12 ----- ----- -----

Total 198 214 230

7.7 The above investment is likely to stimulate additional sponsorship from other sources and any such extra funds will be applied to strengthen the regional bid.

8 Financial / In Kind Contributions

8.1 It is proposed that funding will be met from the following sources:

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

£k £k £k

8.1 (1) Costs met by local authorities

Staffing Costs (i.e. Project Management,

Administration) 70 70 70

Marketing, Travel, Accommodation 20 30 40

----- ----- -----

Sub-total 90 100 110

8.1 (2) Costs met by other partners (in kind or sponsorship)

Marketing materials, web design & host,

advocate, delivery 60 65 70

IT equipment, infrastructure & support 12 12 12

Office space, equipment 12 12 12

Hosting visitors 12 13 14

Financial & budgetary control 12 12 12

----- ----- -----

Sub-total 108 114 120

----- ----- -----

Total 198 214 230

8.2 The costs shown in section (1) are all items which will require funding. Those items in section (2), funded by the universities and businesses, include a number of items which can be supplied within existing resources (i.e. they include "marginal" costs).

8.3 The West of England Working Group will be asked to decide the allocation of costs in (1), recognising that the greatest economic benefits to the sub-region will fall to Bristol and Bath whilst the sporting legacy benefits will be more evenly felt. It is proposed to recommend therefore that costs be met as follows:

Bath & North East Somerset 33.3% (e.g. Year 1 = £30K)

Bristol CC 33.3% (e.g. Year 1 = £30K)

North Somerset 16.7% (e.g. Year 1 = £15K)

South Gloucestershire 16.7% (e.g. Year 1 = £15K)

8.4 It is proposed that all funds in (1) will be administered by the Chief Executive of the West of England Partnership who will also be responsible for the management of directly employed staff.

8.5 There is a need to agree what proportion of the costs incurred in section (2) require additional funding and how these will be contributed to by the remaining partners.

9 Conclusions

9.1 The potential economic, cultural and other benefits to the sub-region of being successfully involved in the lead up to 2012 are significant. The timescales for ensuring that the sub-region gets a significant level of involvement are challenging. The sub-regional vision was launched in July 2006 and there is a need to ensure that support structures and management are put in place as a matter of some urgency. Agreement on budgets and funding is essential if this initiative is to yield the benefits envisaged and a detailed project plan and budget developed.

Matthew Smith

Revised: 21/10/06

Appendix A

A sub-regional Vision for the Olympic Legacy

Mission Statement:

The West of England Working Group for the 2012 Games is working with the South West Regional Team to develop realistic and coherent plans to maximise the opportunities offered by the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games, both nationally and internationally.

Philosophy:

The run up to 2012 offers a unique opportunity to generate long term benefits for all communities, sporting and cultural organisations and for business.

We possess strong public, private and voluntary sectors and have a demonstrable track record of effective partnership working which will be used to deliver a sustainable programme.

Actions:

1. Increased participation in sport improves health, reduces crime and improves community spirit:

We will promote the value of activity at all levels, through schools programmes, volunteer opportunities and cultural festivals and seek to do what is required to improve standards of sporting performance.

2. Enormous demand for goods and services will be generated by 2012.

We will ensure business is in the best position to take advantage of all the available opportunities.

3. People will be drawn from around the world to the Games.

We will develop an attractive portfolio drawing attention to the many attributes which make the West of England such a tremendous place to live, visit, work and do business and which offers the scope to stage major sporting, cultural and commercial events.

Appendix B

Benefits of 2012 to the Sub-Region

Children and Education

Improvements: The Group will seek to secure inward investment (government, lottery) to improve school sports equipment, facilities and coaching / leaders / volunteer infrastructure.

Equipment used at the games will be re-distributed around the whole of the UK - for free, for community sports clubs and elite training facilities.

Inclusion: Sports participation crosses the social divide and will help to integrate disadvantaged communities with people from more affluent districts

Behaviour: By involving more young people in sporting activity there is the potential to reduce vandalism and anti-social behaviour.

Economic Development

Tourism: Tourism is a key industry in the area. With the investment, the world-class facilities available will attract national and global press coverage of the sub-region. The increased media exposure will boost tourism and could create a new tourist attraction - international celebrity athletes training in the locality.

Tourism 2012 Charter: Aims to influence the 180,000 tourism related companies to drive up standards, improve disabled access, improve worker skills for all tourism attractions that will play a part in 2012. (First Group attended the launch meeting with the PM).

Support for local business: By boosting tourism, various sectors will gain from increased visitor numbers: hotels, restaurants, caterers, printers.

Job creation / retention: By targeting and hosting training camps for international teams the region will create social and economic links which could lead to other future commercial interactions.