Meeting documents
Cabinet
Wednesday, 6th November, 2002
Appendix 2
Financial Plan Review: Technical Annex
This paper provides additional background information on the Council's Financial Plan.
1. Summary of "Base Plan"
2. Financial Plan Pressures - current working list (these have not been "agreed")
3. Use & Reconciliation of General Fund balances - position statement
4. Various scenarios of level of grant versus Council Tax at different spending pressure levels - to illustrate the range of uncertainty affecting the Council
Three Year Strategy - Base Summary Position Base Budget |
||||||||
All in £k |
||||||||
Key Data |
Year 3 - 2002/03 |
Year 4 - 2003/04 |
Year 5 - 2004/05 |
Year 6- 2005/06 |
Year 7 - 2006/07 |
|||
Council Tax increase |
6.99% |
6.21% |
5.60% |
5.66% |
7.10% |
|||
Net Revenue Shortfall to 4% Council Tax Increase (non cumulative) £k |
1,263 |
951 |
1,042 |
2,115 |
||||
Base Spend (£k) |
146,924 |
151,278 |
158,881 |
167,020 |
178,042 |
|||
Education Passport via revenue |
74% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|||
Education Passport via revenue and capital |
100% |
<100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|||
Net Reduction in "other" services i.e. as base budget parameter - collective targets after year 1 |
2.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
|||
Increase in Social Services (net of efficiency savings) |
9.9% |
4.9% |
4.6% |
4.7% |
7.3% |
|||
Increase in Education (net of efficiency savings and excluding capital funding) |
4.8% |
5.6% |
5.6% |
5.6% |
5.6% |
|||
Increase in Revenue Budget Non Education & Social Services budget (excluding agency) |
-2.4% |
0.5% |
2.2% |
2.6% |
4.8% |
|||
Increase in Overall Budget (net of efficiency savings) |
4.3% |
5.7% |
4.9% |
5.2% |
6.6% |
|||
Increase in overall SSA predicted |
5.5% |
5.3% |
4.7% |
4.8% |
5.1% |
|||
Increase in grant predicted |
5.5% |
5.0% |
4.1% |
4.2% |
4.2% |
|||
Key Assumptions |
||||||||
Pay Inflation @ (APTC) |
3.50% |
4.00% |
3.00% |
3.00% |
3.00% |
|||
Pay Inflation @ (Teachers) |
3.60% |
3.00% |
3.00% |
3.00% |
3.00% |
|||
Inflation @ |
2.50% |
2.50% |
2.50% |
2.50% |
2.50% |
|||
Interest Rates @ |
4.50% |
4.00% |
4.00% |
4.00% |
4.00% |
|||
Funding by balances (£'000) |
3,806 |
-36 |
-134 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Funding through Lambridge Reserve |
350 |
-200 |
-150 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Provision for delays, changes in SSA etc (£'000) and other unforeseen pressures |
0 |
300 |
1,500 |
3,300 |
5,800 |
|||
Capital |
||||||||
Financial Plan spending funded from capital - incl. Spa, Stone Mines(£'000) |
20,919 |
22,934 |
17,965 |
15,455 |
15,455 |
|||
Of which Education |
4,308 |
5,174 |
1,900 |
1,400 |
1,400 |
|||
Social Services |
954 |
1,676 |
1,600 |
1,100 |
100 |
|||
Other |
15,657 |
16,084 |
14,465 |
12,955 |
13,955 |
Financial Plan Pressures
We are aware of significant potential spending pressures for next year and beyond, including:
· Cost pressures, including pay, staff pensions and residential care fees - in excess of £5 million
Residential nursing fees may rise following an independent review - a small increase of £20 a week will add £1m to the budget.
The recently agreed APTC pay award will add another £750k to forecast costs and it is also expected that teachers pay will add another £500k more to current budgets.
The contribution that the authority will be expected to make to teachers pensions (as set by a Government actuary) is expected to rise by £2.5m.
Any increase in the Fire Pay award in excess of the 3% allowed in the plan and not funded by government grant will add to this total.
· Costs arising from government legislation and regulations - around £2.5 million
The increase in employers' National Insurance contributions set by the Chancellor in his last budget will cost £400k
The impact of potential penalties due to delayed discharge of patients from hospital could mean penalties of up to £500,000..
The impact of fairer charging regulations from the government may lead to a loss of income from charges for home care by £160k
New regulations such as health and safety in cemeteries, the introduction of processing of tax credits by local authorities, asset management planning requirements, land registration requirements, changes to concessionary fares regulations, requirements to change political structures, e government, higher set standards may all increase costs for every local authority.
· Lost income from government grants - around £2.5 million
There are proposals for the transfer of many social services functions both to and away from Local Authorities, such as the transfer of free nursing care. A 10% loss on transfer would be a loss of £600k, and a larger variation is possible.
Withdrawal and/or transfer of grant support from the government to the SSA for education, such as infant class sizes and post 16-budget support grant. Potential loss of £750k.
· Demographic pressures, economic factors and internal cost pressures - around £1.5 million
Increasing home care is required because of our ageing population £400k.
Increasing numbers of pupils in schools and pupils requiring statements of special educational needs £200k.
Falling interest rates mean we earn less interest on cash we have in the bank. This interest subsidises service spending £200k.
Growth in income on our commercial property is dependent on rent reviews and is currently increasing at a rate of less than inflation £500k.
· Internal Spending Pressures
There are a variety of internal spending pressures, the most significant of which are:
Pressures on office accommodation budgets due to delayed office moves, rising staff numbers - up to £400k
Listed building fee income - no legislative power to charge £100k
Use and Reconciliation of General Fund Balances
Type |
£k |
|
Opening balance as reported in final accounts from 2001/02: |
Balance |
4,243 |
Use from accounts 2001/02 |
Use |
-337 |
Sub total |
3,906 |
|
Extra Balances on top HRA |
Addition |
1,911 |
Reported general fund balances 2001/02 final accounts |
5,817 |
|
2002/03 uses (earmarking) |
||
Risk Mgt & Invest to Save not yet spent |
Use |
-301 |
HRA costs not yet charged (provision from £1.9m) |
Use |
-100 |
PARIS |
Use |
-126 |
Other misc. previously earmarked uses |
Use |
-110 |
Use in Budget 2002/03 |
Use |
-1,331 |
Tourism contingency |
Use |
-100 |
Executive contingency. *This was set aside in the 2002/03 budget as a contingency for potential additional unavoidable costs in 2002/03 |
Use |
-342 |
Less use of Lambridge reserve in budget |
Addition |
350 |
Sub total of uses |
-2,060 |
|
New balances total |
Balance |
3,757 |
Legal challenges and extra costs modernisation - approval Council in July 02 |
Use |
-258 |
Approval by Executive in October to Norton Radstock Regeneration Company (NRR) up to £25,000 to assist with future Company operations |
Use |
-25 |
Likely allocation of remaining Avon balances to be transferred in October 2002 |
Addition |
463 |
Remaining Minimum Balances (not yet earmarked) plus there is a further £342k in the Executive Contingency* for 2002/03. |
Balance |
3,937 |
Net minimum at 2.5% is |
3,600 |