Meeting documents
Cabinet
Wednesday, 5th March, 2003
Bath and North East Somerset
Youth Justice Plan
Annual Plan 2003 - 2004
SECTION A
Introduction
This is the fourth Youth Justice Plan for Bath and North East Somerset, produced in accordance with Section 40 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. It provides an update on the three year Plan for 2002/2005, reporting on progress against national performance measures and reconviction rates, and outlining how key issues will be taken forward in 2003/2004. It also sets out how the Local Authority's statutory work of preventing youth offending will be resourced and monitored, in partnership with the Police, Probation and Health Services.
SUMMARY
The last year has seen significant expansion and development of the work of the Youth Offending Team and its partners. This has included the introduction of mandatory Referral Orders for first-time offenders, in April 2002 and the Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme for prolific young offenders, in September 2002. Both of these Youth-Justice Board - funded projects have included the appointment of new staff bringing new skills and expertise to the team.
Significant progress has been made towards meeting a number of performance measures - in four of the thirteen areas we are already exceeding the targets for 2003 and in a number of other measures, we are making very good progress. Of concern however, is the high re-offending rate of young people subject to community penalties and the increasing use of the secure estate for remands and custodial sentences. Whilst the majority of young people coming to Police attention do not re-offend, there is a significant minority of young people living in Bath and North East Somerset at high risk of re-offending or already offending persistently. Not surprisingly, these young people re more likely to have experience of public care, difficulties in or exclusion from school, unsettled family arrangements and inconsistent parenting, and a range of other factors known to increase their risk of offending. Therefore the priorities for the year ahead are:-
· Development of the new Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme for persistent young offenders and the quality of offence-focused work undertaken.
· Work with the Children's Fund partnership to develop a multi-agency panel to agree action plans or other responses to support young people involved in disorderly behaviour or at high risk of offending.
· Development of the Restorative Justice work of the team and its partners, with a particular focus on the involvement of direct victims and other people affected by youth crime.
Approval
Table A: Chief Officer Approval of the Youth Justice Plan.
Name of Chief Officer |
Signature |
Date |
|
Chief Executive of The Local Authority |
John Everitt |
||
Education Department |
Mike Young |
||
Health Service |
Rhona Macdonald |
||
Police Service |
Rod Hansen |
||
Probation Service |
Jeanette Whitford |
||
Social and Housing Services |
Jane Ashman |
SECTION B
Prevention Strategy
A significant number of vulnerable young people may not receive help to achieve their potential because they do not meet the existing thresholds of statutory and other services. Some of these young people's circumstances place them at high risk of offending and a small number may make decisions which lead them to commit offences. The Youth Justice Board has published research Youth Justice Board Research Note No 5, Communities that Care, November 2001, which strengthens the case that early intervention with these young people can effectively reduce that risk, building on protective factors and supporting them to make positive choices. Local Authority Chief Executives have been asked to take the lead in establishing Identification, Referral and Tracking systems for all vulnerable young people and in ensuring that all agencies providing services for young people work together to develop and agree a local preventative strategy. Youth Offending Teams have a key role to play in this work, which will be developing during 2003.
Locally, concerns were raised about unacceptable levels of youth disorder and criminal behaviour in South Bath during the Summer of 2001. An inter-agency group met to consider how to enhance the ability of all agencies to respond in a co-ordinated manner and to agree on broader-based approaches to prevent youth disorder. The Council approved recommendations made in five broad areas:-
1. Establishment of mechanisms for early and appropriate intervention and preventative work with young people at risk.
2. Improvement of support for parents and encouragement for vulnerable parents to access services.
3. Empowerment of young people and the wider community to tackle issues of concern, to build confidence and offer protection against intimidation.
4. Tackle misuse of alcohol and drugs by young people.
5. Co-ordination and accountability by all agencies.
This work of tackling youth disorder and preventing offending is being taken forward by the Children and Young People's Strategic Partnership. This will include the appointment of a Youth Crime Prevention Co-ordinator, funded by the Community Safety Partnership under the Safer Communities Initiative. The same Partnership also has oversight of the Children's Fund, twenty-five per cent of which has now been earmarked for services, jointly agreed with the Youth Offending Team, which have the specific aim of preventing the involvement of children aged 5 - 13 in crime and anti-social behaviour. The Partnership is planning to use this funding to introduce Youth Inclusion and Support Panels.
These multi-agency Panels receive referrals of young people considered at high risk of offending (and possibly also at risk of school exclusion) and agree voluntary actions plans to reduce the risk. The Children's Fund will be used to employ staff to work directly with these young people, particularly to promote their participation in education, training and employment, and to support their parents. The Panels will be organised by the Youth Crime Prevention Co-ordinator. They will make a significant contribution to the Council's Prevention Strategy and they will be able to inform the establishment of Identification, Referral and Tracking systems in the future.
SECTION C
Governance and resources
Table B: Membership of the Responsible Authorities Group
This group meets approximately eight times each year and is the chief officer group responsible for the Community Safety Partnership, the Youth Offending Team, the Drug Action Team and the Partnership against Racial Harassment.
Name |
Agency Represented |
Post held in Agency |
Ethnicity |
Gender |
Chair: Jane Ashman |
Bath and North East Somerset Council |
Strategic Director Social and Housing Services |
White |
Female |
John Wiseman |
National Probation Service, Avon and Somerset |
Assistant Chief |
White |
Male |
Kieron Morgan |
Bath and North East Somerset Primary Care Trust |
Director of Public Health |
White |
Male |
Rod Hansen |
Avon and Somerset Constabulary |
District Commander Bath and North East Somerset |
White |
Male |
The Responsible Authorities Group meets with the following officers present:
Name |
Agency Represented |
Post held in Agency |
Ethnicity |
Gender |
Sally Churchyard |
Bath and North East Somerset Youth Offending Team |
Manager |
White |
Female |
Annalise Elliott |
Bath and North East Somerset Council |
Group Manager, Community Safety Equalities and Partnerships |
White |
Female |
Linda Frankland |
Bath and North East Somerset Social and Housing Services |
Finance Manager |
White |
Female |
Membership of the Youth Offending Team Steering Group. This Group meets six times each year to formulate and monitor the Youth Justice Plan.
Name |
Agency Represented |
Post held in Agency |
Ethnicity |
Gender |
Chair: Maurice Lindsay |
Bath and North East Somerset Social Services |
Head of Children and families Service |
White |
Male |
Sally Churchyard |
Bath and North East Somerset Youth Offending Team |
Manager |
White |
Female |
Gail Quinton |
Bath and North East Somerset Education Service |
Assistant Director |
White |
Female |
Sue Hull |
National Probation Service, Avon and Somerset |
Area Manager |
White |
Female |
Mike Bowden |
Bath and North East Somerset Primary Care Trust |
Assistant Director |
White |
Male |
Paul Bright |
Avon and Somerset Constabulary |
Community Safety Inspector |
White |
Male |
Chris Hounsell |
Connexions West of England |
Development Manager for Bath and North East Somerset |
White |
Female |
Resources
Table C: Services planned for the financial year 2003/2004
Core Activity |
Service Provider If Not Solely the YOT |
Total Budget or Projected Cost to the YOT (£) |
Preventative services |
Crime Concern Mentoring Plus Project (Commissioned by Social and Housing Services), Key Project (funded by Youth and Community and Police and Parenting Project (funded by Community Safety Partnership) |
£76,000 + 5% of total budget |
PACE services |
Information to follow |
|
Pre Court |
Police: Issuing Final Warnings |
Information to follow |
Court based services |
Information to follow |
|
Remand services |
Local Authority Secure placements and escorts are Youth Justice Board commissioned. |
Information to follow |
Community based disposals |
Education, Connexions, Probation (Community Punishment Orders) |
Information to follow |
Through care / after care |
Connexions |
Information to follow |
Other Orders (Parenting) |
Educational Psychology Department under Service Level Agreement with the Youth Offending Team. |
Information to follow |
Total |
Not costed |
Table D: Youth Offending Team Budget Financial Year 2003/2004 - Sources
Agency |
Staffing Costs (£) |
Payments in Kind - Revenue (£) |
Other Delegated Funds (£) |
Total (£) |
Police |
£31,295 |
£3,000 (vehicle) |
||
Probation |
£32,415 |
Staff expenses (not costed) |
||
Social Services |
£144,756 |
£22,507 (staff expenses, Financial, Personnel, Management and Legal services) |
Secure Accommodation and Secure Escorts |
|
Education |
Staff expenses (not costed) Service Level Agreement with Educational Psychology for 2 sessions per week( ) and 0.1 fte Alternative Education Co-ordinator time ( ) |
|||
Health |
£22,232 |
Clinical supervision (not listed) and staff expenses (not costed) |
||
Local Authority Chief Executive |
||||
Additional Funding (Table E) |
£278,962 |
|||
Total |
Not costed |
Table E: Additional sources of income
Additional Source |
Amount (£) |
Single Regeneration Budget |
|
European Funding |
|
Youth Justice Board |
£202,962 |
Children's Fund |
£76,000 |
Total |
£278,962 |
Table F: Pooled budget
Agency Contributing |
Amount (£) |
Police |
£23,181 |
Probation Service |
£7,816 |
Social Services |
£7,905 |
Education |
£7,440 |
Health Service |
£12,798 |
LA Chief Executive |
|
Total |
£59,140 |
Table G: Health Service contributions to the Youth Offending Teams
This table enables a breakdown by source of Health Service funding.
Health contribution: Funding source |
Amount (£k) |
Source 1 (pooled budget) (staffing) |
£12,798 £22,232 |
Total |
£35,030 |
SECTION D
Performance targets
MEASURE 1: Reduce the number of young offenders committing offences of Domestic Burglary, Vehicle Crime and Robbery.
Target:
Domestic Burglary: |
8% reduction by December 2003; 16% by December 2004; 25% by December 2005. |
Vehicle crime: |
20% reduction by December 2003; 30% by December 2004. |
Robbery (within principal cities): |
5% reduction by December 2003; 10% by December 2004; 15% by December 2005. |
Offence |
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
2005 Target |
Burglary |
26 |
Not set |
14 |
21 |
18 |
18 |
Vehicle crime |
18 |
Not set |
57 |
16 |
15 |
13 |
Robbery |
9 |
Not set |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
Actions to achieve the target
· Young people convicted of these offences will be the priority group for the Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme.
· Specific intervention modules will be developed for use with all young people convicted of Burglary and Robbery.
· The existing motor module will be developed for use with persistent young offenders.
Constraints
Influences from neighbouring Bristol are believed to be affecting local people, particularly with respect to vehicle crime and substance misuse.
Links to agency partners
Police Inspector for Persistent Offenders, strategy to improve detection rates on priority offences.
New Landsown Tuition Centre (Pupil Referral Unit) provision to be extended to all young people on the Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme.
Links to allied themes
Developing provision for those subject to Final Warnings and Referral Orders.
Developing reparation activities to match the offence-type and offence seriousness.
Learning and development actions
Provide coaching for practitioners in the use of the new modules, and use the Youth Justice Board effective Practice Learning and Development Programme and related learning materials to extend skills and confidence.
MEASURE 2: Reduce re-offending rates for pre-court disposals, first tier penalties,
community penalties and custodial penalties.
Target:
By December 2003 achieve a reduction of 3% |
based on 2000 cohort compared with 2001 cohort after 12 months. |
By December 2004 achieve a reduction of 5% |
based on 2000 cohort compared with 2001 cohort after 24 months. |
Outcome band |
2000 cohort% re-offending after 12 months |
2000 cohort % re-offending after 24 months |
2001 cohort % re-offending after 12 months |
2002 cohort (Number Oct/Dec) |
Pre-Court |
36% |
37% |
33.3% |
52 |
First tier Penalties |
44.4% |
66% |
26.3% |
32 |
Community penalties |
56.52% |
65.21% |
80% |
10 |
Custody |
100% (but 100% of those returning to the community) |
100% |
100% |
7 |
Actions to achieve the target
· Develop linking of ASSET assessment with interventions planned.
· Develop the quality of offending behaviour work undertaken across the team, particularly with young people on Court Orders.
Constraints
The closure of HMP and YOI Ashfield to sentenced young people will make it more difficult to undertake regular, offence-focused work.
The turn-over of staff in the Youth Offending Team, particularly from Social Services, interrupts the continuity and consistency of work undertaken.
Links to agency partners
Develop effective joint approaches with those in Social Services holding responsibility for Looked After Children, a high proportion of whom offend.
Links to allied themes
Work of Looked After Children Management and Development.
Learning and development actions
Train new staff in offending behaviour interventions.
Implement learning from recent Teen Talk training.
Extend availability of STAR and other cognitive behavioural approaches by training more staff.
Continuing development of multi-agency KEEPSAFE project for young abusers.
MEASURE 3: Increase the proportion of Final Warnings supported by interventions.
Target:
Proportion of Final Warnings supported by interventions: |
70% by December 2003; 80% by December 2004. |
Final Warnings |
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
Total Final Warnings |
90 |
72 |
|||
Final Warnings with an Intervention |
85 |
71 |
|||
% |
94% |
Not set |
98.6% |
99% |
100% |
Actions to achieve the target
The target is fully achieved and the focus of work will be on developing the effectiveness of interventions by:-
· Reviewing how they are promoted to young people.
· Increasing the number of standard intervention modules available (including a compulsory session for those not in full-time education, training or employment).
· Reviewing the link between the ASSET score and planned intervention.
· Involving sessional workers is co-delivering interventions
· Introducing more small group work and more reparative activities.
· Working with Police to increase the proportion of young people notified to the Youth Offending Team before the Final Warning is issued.
Constraints
Staff availability and suitable space for working with young people, supervisors and placements for reparative activities.
Links to agency partners
Community Safety Inspector re: notifications and Police HQ staff working on proposals arising from new national guidance.
Links to allied themes
Development of Referral Order interventions.
Drug Action Team screening for all young people.
Team approach to Education, Training and Employment
Learning and development actions
Training programme for sessional workers.
Staff training in substance misuse awareness/screening.
MEASURE 4: Reduce the use of the secure estate for remands and custodial sentences.
Target:
Remands: |
Reduce the number of remands to the secure estate (as a proportion of all remand episodes excluding Conditional/Unconditional Bail) to 30% by December 2004. |
Custody: |
Reduce the number of custodial sentences as a proportion of all Court disposals to 6% by December 2004. |
Outcome |
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
Remands % |
46% |
Not set |
60% |
45% |
30% |
Custodial Sentences % |
9% |
9% |
14% |
Revised to 9% |
6% |
Actions to achieve the target
· Continuing to promote awareness of the Bail Supervision Scheme, particularly in the adult Magistrates Court and amongst defence solicitors.
· Train sessional workers to support the programme.
· Develop quality of offending behaviour interventions, evaluate and feed back to sentences and other partners.
Constraints
Sentencers reported lack of confidence in electronic monitoring of curfews.
Limited (but realistic) capacity for the Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme.
Shortage of suitable accommodation for young people with no appropriate home address.
Links to agency partners
Develop joint planning with Social Services Family Placement and Adolescent and Leaving Care Team.
Increasing dialogue with sentencers re: outcomes.
Links to allied themes
Development of the Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme.
The Youth Offending Team is seeking to highlight within the Authority the disengagement from services of young people moving across Authority boundaries, particularly those moving back and forth between Bristol and Bath.
Learning and development actions
Research project with Bath University (re: sentencing decisions).
Court skills training and developing use/potential of Youth Offending Team office at Court.
Sessional Worker training (Bail Supervision Scheme).
Continuing audits of formal reports and learning from outcomes.
MEASURE 5: Use of Restorative Justice processes.
Target:
Ensure Restorative Justice processes are used in: |
60% of disposals by December 2003; 80% of disposals by December 2004. |
RJ process |
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
% |
32% |
Not set |
61% |
60% |
80% |
Actions to achieve the target
We are already exceeding the target for 2003 and will aim to increase the proportion and quality of Restorative Justice interventions. This will include:-
· Establishing local minimum standards for Restorative Justice work.
· Ensuring that all Referral Order contracts and most community and custodial Orders include work on letters of explanation/apology.
· Working to improve victim contact and engagement, to ensure that their views are included wherever feasible.
Constraints
Identifying and developing placements that enable a good match with offence and offence seriousness.
Difficulty in recruiting Panel Members for second intake (Referral Orders).
Links to agency partners
Work with local Police to increase initial victim permission to contact.
Links to allied themes
Council bio-diversity project (WEB).
Youth Service/Education accreditation.
Learning and development actions
Training in preparation of letters of explanation and apology. Affirmation/accreditation for young people on community placements. Restorative Justice training as part of induction for all new staff.
Staff annual reviews of performance should include identification and addressing of Restorative Justice training needs.
MEASURE 6: Proportion of victims, who have been either consulted or who have participated in restorative processes, are either satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome.
Target:
70% of victims satisfied or very satisfied by December 2004. |
Data:
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
|
% |
None surveyed |
Not set |
Not available |
50% |
70% |
Actions to achieve the target
· Review and ensure that robust evaluation procedures are followed.
· Extend range and offence-relevance of reparation placements.
· Promote victim attendance at Referral Order Panels.
· Promote use of direct and indirect mediation.
· Develop promotional literature for use with victims.
Constraints
There is no dedicated Youth Offending Team Worker for victim consultation or participation work
Links to agency partners
Victim support is represented on Referral Order Steering Group Local Police re promoting take up of services by victims.
Links to allied themes
Youth Offending Team is promoting the use of mediation to resolve conflicts in schools.
Learning and development actions
Induction and ongoing training for all practitioners in restorative justice approaches.
Incorporation of victim feedback into the development of Services offered.
MEASURE 7: Parental satisfaction (statutory and voluntary parenting programmes.)
Target:
70% of parents leaving parenting programmes complete the course. |
70% of those completing programmes are either satisfied or very satisfied. |
Data:
Measure |
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
2005 Target |
% completing programmes |
25% |
Not set |
None completed |
70% |
||
% satisfied or very satisfied |
25% |
Not set |
N/A |
70% |
Actions to achieve the target
· Introduce presentations about the nature of work undertaken with young people to groups of parents.
· Survey a sample of parents to improve understanding of what sort of programmes are needed
Constraints
No dedicated Youth Offending Team Worker for parents.
Relatively little local provision for parents of teenagers who are offending.
Parents of young people who offend into attending any parenting support programmes.
Links to agency partners
In partnership with the wider Community Safety Partnership, work is underway to promote and extend services for parents of young people (aged 8-13) at risk of offending.
The Youth Offending Team has a Service Level Agreement with the Education Psychology Service, which includes interventions under Parenting Orders and voluntary parenting skills and support work.
Links to allied themes
Prevention Strategy and work of the Children's Fund partnership.
Learning and development actions
Motivational skills.
MEASURE 8: Ensure ASSET is completed for all (100%) young people subject to community disposals end custodial sentences.
Target:
Community disposals: |
100% at assessment and closure stages. |
Custodial sentences: |
100% at assessment, transfer to community and closure stages. |
Data:
MeasureCommunity |
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
2005 Target |
% Assessments Completed |
81% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
% Closures Completed |
86% |
None set |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
MeasureCustody |
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
2005 Target |
% AssessmentsCompleted |
92% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
% Transfer Completed |
83% |
None set |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
% Closure Completed |
81% |
None set |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Actions to achieve the target
The target is fully achieved. This is to be maintained by continuing:-
· To monitor completion through staff supervision.
· Periodic audit of reports to focus on ASSET completion and links with supervision plan.
Constraints
Although the total number of annual notifications remains steady, the caseloads in the Youth Offending Team are rising, because of the effect of legislation.
It is difficult to access information from schools during holiday periods.
Links to agency partners.
Protocol discussions with Social Services about acceptance of ASSET as an initial assessment under the national Assessment Framework.
Links to allied themes
Improving matching of ASSET scores with planned interventions.
Learning and development actions
ASSET training to be part of induction for all new staff, even those with Youth Offending Team experience.
MEASURE 9: Pre-Sentence Reports
Target:
Ensure that 90% of Pre-Sentence Reports are submitted within the timescales prescribed by National Standards (10 days for PYOs, 15 days for the general offender population). |
Data:
% PSR's Completed |
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
2005 Target |
PYO |
41% |
None set |
36.5% |
60% |
75% |
90% |
General |
76% |
None set |
63.4% |
80% |
85% |
90% |
Actions to achieve the target
· Reach agreement with the Court over setting Bail conditions to keep appointments and one-week adjournments to check progress, for young offenders who have a history of missing appointments.
· Increase flexibility within team by recruiting a small pool of sessional report writers, particularly for Christmas holiday period.
Constraints
No dedicated report writers so little flexibility to offer additional appointments if those originally offered are missed.
Court practice of requesting update reports in respect of new offences committed whilst on Bail.
Links to agency partners
Agreed with Social Services to review the Social Worker complement in the team.
Links to allied themes
Swift administration of justice - contributing towards reducing the number of days from arrest to sentence.
Learning and development actions
Develop report-writing skills across wider sector of the team.
MEASURE 10: Ensure that all initial training plans for young people subject to Detention and Training Orders and drawn up within timescales prescribed by National Standards.
Target:
All (100%) initial training plans drawn up within ten working days of the sentence being passed. |
Data:
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
2005 Target |
|
% |
25% |
None set |
76% |
80% |
90% |
100% |
Actions to achieve the target
· Prioritise initial training plans across the team rather than just with caseholders, to ensure that the Youth Offending Team is represented at all planning meetings.
· Maintain a local system for monitoring the timeliness and quality of the plans.
· Allocate caseholders to nominated institutions to maximise contacts.
Constraints
Closure of HMP and YOI Ashfield to sentenced young people means that most Bath and North East Somerset young people will serve their Detention and Training Orders more than 50 miles from home - and from the Youth Offending Team office, making visits more time consuming and difficult to schedule.
Links to agency partners
Ensure co-operative planning with Social Services with regard to Looked After Children.
Links to allied themes
Reducing the use of the secure estate (Measure 4)
Learning and development actions
Supporting more staff to become involved in planning meetings.
MEASURE 11: Education, Training and Employment.
Target:
To ensure that the young offenders who are supervised by the Yot are either in full-time education, training or employment: 80% by December 2003; 90% by December 2004. |
Data:
ETE |
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
% |
47.6% of a small sample |
None set |
85.9% |
90% |
90% |
Actions to achieve the target
The national target for 2003 is already exceeded.
· Complete protocol with Connexions Service and ensure priority is given to work with persistent young offenders.
· Work with schools to introduce peer mediation
· Develop a co-ordinated approach to provision of education for young people moving back and forth between Bristol and Bath.
Constraints
Lack of suitable provision for the minority of hard-to-engage persistent young offenders.
Links to agency partners
A new 0.7 fte Education Worker has been seconded from the Local Authority, with this target as his priority, in partnership with the identified Connexions Link Worker. The Youth Offending Team now has a Service Level Agreement with the Educational Psychology Department for provision of two sessions per week; and the Alternative Education Co-ordinator post has 0.1 fte of her post committed to work with persistent young offenders, including those on the Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme.
Need to establish stronger links with the local branch of the Learning and Skills Council and the two local Further Education Colleges.
Links to allied themes
Local Education Authority target to have all permanently excluded pupils in full-time education - work of the Alternative Education Co-ordinator.
Connexions Service shares the same target.
Highlighting lack of services for young people who move back and forth across Authority boundaries.
Learning and development actions
Training for new Education Worker.
Training for staff in a Key Skills approach to work with young offenders.
MEASURE 12: Accommodation
Target:
_ All Youth Offending Teams have a named accommodation officer.
_ All (100%) young people either subject to community interventions or on release from the secure estate have satisfactory accommodation to go to.
Data:
Accommodation Officer: |
Name: |
Different young people supervised by Youth Offending Team during 2002 |
198 |
Of the above, those that have satisfactory accommodation to go to at either the conclusion of the community intervention or release from the secure estate. |
171 |
% |
85.5% |
Actions to achieve the target
The Youth Offending Team has had a named Accommodation and Support Worker from the outset.
· Continue to highlight issues for young people who offend, at inter-agency planning groups.
· Complete work on the Accommodation Policy for young people who have offended, with particular attention paid to options for young people released from custody.
Constraints
Bath and North East Somerset is an area of high cost housing, compounded by high demand from tourism and two institutions of higher education; there is very little affordable provision for teenagers wishing to live independently.
Links to agency partners
HMP and YOI Ashfield's survey of accommodation provision.
Multi-agency Task Group for Care Leavers and Young Homeless and Support Network for 16-19 year-olds.
Links to allied themes
Supporting People initiatives and pan Avon and Somerset interest in provision of specialist accommodation for 16-17 year olds with complex needs.
Learning and development actions
Observation exchanges between Youth Offending Team and Homeless Team.
Team development event on accommodation issues.
MEASURE 13: Mental Health.
Target:-
All young people, by 2004, who are assessed by ASSET, as manifesting:-
· Acute mental health difficulties to be referred by Youth Offending Teams to the Child and Mental Health Service (CAMHS) for a formal assessment commencing within five working days of the receipt of the referral with a view to their accessing a tier three service or other appropriate CAMHS tier service based on this assessment.
· Non-acute mental health concerns to be referred by the Youth Offending Teams for an assessment, and engagement by the appropriate CAMHS tier (1-3) commenced within 15 working days.
Data:
% Assessments commenced within timescale |
2001 Baseline |
2002 Target |
2002 Outturn |
2003 Target |
2004 Target |
2005 Target |
Acute |
Not available |
Not set |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Non-acute |
Not available |
Not set |
75% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Actions to achieve the target
· Work with CAMHS to explore how the development of new generic Mental health Worker posts can support the work of Health Professionals in the Youth Offending Team.
· Ensure that substance misuse screening is provided for all young people known to the Youth Offending Team.
Constraints
Delays in obtaining psychiatric assessments for Court.
Links to agency partners
New mental health Public Service Agreement target to "improve life outcomes of adults and children with mental health problems through year on year improvements in access to crisis and CAMHS services, and reduce the mortality rate for services and undetermined injury by at least 20% by 2010".
Shared Drug and Alcohol Nurse post within CAMHS, providing 0.5fte worker time in the Youth Offending Team.
Links to allied themes
Allocation of additional funding to develop year on year improvements to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services - guidance issued under the Department of Health Service Circular and Local Authority Circular sets out that youth justice issues are one of the key target groups for funding during 2002/2004.
Learning and development actions
Introduction of the Mental Health Screening Assessment in mid 2003.
SECTION E
Learning and Development
The local Youth Offending Team's policy on Staff Supervision and Annual Reviews and Training sets out a clear commitment to supporting and developing staff, including a standard that each member should receive a minimum of five days' training each year. The Youth Justice Board will be introducing a nationally accredited Learning and Development Programme during 2003. This will include modules to ensure all practitioners are competent in effective practice and have opportunity to study for recognised qualifications. A consortium of Youth Offending Teams in the South West region, together with local secure establishments, will work together to arrange the training. The team will continue to make in-house training available, drawing on the expertise of team members, and commission specialist services. More focused use of team meetings and team development mornings, and exploration of the potential for group peer supervision, will continue.
Training Plan
For Youth Offending Team and Partners 2003/2004
Service Delivery Area |
Anticipated Outcomes |
Targeted Staff Groups |
Other Details |
Standard practitioner induction · Victim awareness/introduction to Restorative Justice · Child protection · Managing conflict · ASSET assessments · Substance Misuse (to Tier 1 and 2) · Health and Safety · YOIS |
Clarity about expectations and roles |
All new practitioners, regardless of any previous YOT experience (plus existing staff who may have missed elements) |
Mostly provided in-house |
Standard administrator induction · Health and Safety · YOIS · Timetabler Database · Managing conflict |
Clarity about expectations and roles |
All new administrative staff, regardless of any previous YOT experience (plus existing staff who may have missed elements) |
Mostly provided in-house |
Delivery of Final Warning interventions |
Ability to work with young people in small groups, jointly with YOT members. |
Sessional Workers |
|
Effective Practice Modules |
Increased effectiveness of offence focused work |
All Practitioners |
Youth Justice Board Programme |
Management Training |
Staff supported to work within the national framework for effective practice. |
Practice Manager and Co-ordinators |
Youth Justice Board Management Programme and local Supervision, Health and Safety and Personnel procedures training provided by partner agencies. |
· Number of staff required to attend modules of Effective Practice Learning and Development Programme (available from Sept 2003) |
16 |
· Number of volunteers undertaking training (eg Referral Order Cluster Award /AA NVQ) |
8 |
· Number of staff requesting to undertake learning leading to nationally accredited qualification (available from Sept 2003) |
2 |
· Number of managers undertaking YJB management programme |
1 |
Local recruitment plans Appointments have been made to all existing posts in the Youth Offending Team but, with secondment reviews and individual aspirations, we anticipate some further staff turn-over in 2003/2004. We are in discussion with some partners regarding succession planning. We are also keen to continue student work experience placements and introduce brief observation exchanges. We are committed to developing the skills of sessional workers and volunteers, who may be interested in applying for posts in the Youth Offending Team in the future. |
|||
Any formal links with local LSC to support staff training A pan Avon-Somerset protocol has been drafted. |
|||
Any formal links with higher educational institutions in region The Youth Offending Team Practice Manager lectures on the DipSW Course at Bath University. A social policy researcher Chairs the Community Safety Partnership, and may become involved in some research with the Youth Offending Team concerning custodial sentencing. |
|||
Local and regional support available to produce training plans The South West Consortium of Youth Offending Team Managers is jointly commissioning the Somerset Youth Offending Team Training Officer to work with a national consultant to draw up a proposal for taking this forward during 2003. |
|||
Nature of links with any secure establishments in Youth Offending Team region for training purposes These will be developed with Vinney Green and other Local Authority Secure Units in the region, as part of the Consortium's work. |
Youth Justice Plan - Checklist
Information required |
Included?: yes/no |
Reason for absence |
Summary and approval A |
||
Summary |
||
Approval - table A |
||
Prevention Strategy B |
||
KPIs C |
||
Prevention |
||
Recidivism |
||
Final Warnings |
||
Use of secure facilities |
||
Use of restorative processes |
||
Victim satisfaction |
||
Parental satisfaction |
||
ASSET |
||
Pre-Sentence Reports |
||
Detention and Training Orders |
||
Education, Training and Employment |
||
Accommodation |
||
Mental Health |
||
Governance and resources D |
||
Table B - Membership of Steering Group |
||
Table 26 - Core activity |
||
Table 27 - Budget |
||
Table 27a : Additional sources of income |
||
Table 27b : Pooled Budget |
||
Table 27d : Health Service contributions to Youth Offending Team |
||
Learning and Development E |