Meeting documents
Cabinet
Wednesday, 4th September, 2002
Performance Report to Management Board
Date |
07 August 2002 |
Executive Portfolio |
ENVIRONMENTAL |
Lead Director |
Clive Thomas |
SCOPE OF REPORTING AREA:
Waste Services, Planning Services and Sustainability, Economic Development, Tourism and Local Partnerships
1. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES ARISING FROM RESULTS
Progress Made |
Issue to be addressed |
Who |
|||
Leadership |
· Continued Joint Working with Private Sector through Open Planning Forum · Joint working on Ten year Development Framework for Bath Spa University · Exemplar Status achieved for `Car Clear' Partnership. · LGA Waste Executive visit to Council as Waste Beacon. · £1 million grant secured for bulky waste and recycling project, education and Council wide plastics recycling · Environment Park Manager appointed 1/07/02 · Good Best Value Review rating for Waste Services · Development of Vehicle Removal Services for £50 (collect and destroy) · Fundamental review of Council's responsibilities under Avon Act and Corporate discharge of them |
· Developing Contractual Agreements for Major Planning Applications · Close working to explore options and solution to expansion plans - feed into Local Plan process · Secure Staff resource · Maintaining high national profile. · 1 Year funding only. 2nd year funding likely to require Council commitment to fund on an ongoing basis. · Head of Waste Management and Zero Waste advertised Nationally · Development of Business Plan to deliver Action Plan · Co-ordination with other agencies · Completed and redefined service transferred to single function in Building Control. Handover and budget transfers being effected. · Potential charges being considered. |
· David Davies · Gary Collins · Waste Ser Man · Waste Ser Man |
||
People Management |
· Planning Service new Management Team in place and working well · Dynamic change in Tourism delivery (arms length company) and secondment to NRR Ltd impacting on service delivery · ECS Disability Awareness Training Completed |
· Improved performance to be maintained and project control mechanisms be embedded in working practise and culture · Explicit statement of consequences of 2 Year senior Staff secondment to be considered by Executive (i.e. deferment/cessation increased risk factors). |
· David Davies · Bill Cotton |
||
Policy and Strategy |
· Draft Economic Development Plan ready for Autumn consultation · Review Change 21 Partnership · Agreed protocol with Police on dealing with Travellers · Arms length Tourism Company being established · Good Progress made on World Heritage Site Management Plan · Local Plan through First Deposit 4000 representations received · Proposed change in Planning legislation · Zero Waste Strategy being developed in partnership · B&NES part of National Steering Group Developing Best Practise on Civic Amenity Sites · Potential for Public Service Agreements to enhance Public Toilet Quality. |
· Maintain momentum and level of interest and engagement · Effectively link to Local strategic Partnership · Implement as appropriate · Careful management of process and involvement of and communication with staff · Maintain Momentum · Resource implication of dealing with extent of representations · Very careful consideration as to effect on our developing new plan - ongoing discussions with GOSW · Member consideration as part of overall Waste Strategy · Integrate into reprovision proposals as part of Western Riverside · Develop detailed proposals |
· Bill Cotton · Bill Cotton · Environmental Protection Manager · Bill Cotton · David Davies · David Davies · Richard Robertson · New Head of Waste Management and Zero Waste |
||
Resources |
· Short term disposal of fridges contracted, temporary planning secured for short term storage · Rail Track Access Grant awarded · Further £159K awarded to progress `Rethink' Rubbish waste awareness campaign from Landfill Tax credits · Innovation of `Workload Fund' for Development Control crucial in achieving match of resource to Workload · Projected under achievement of income in Tourism · Training Services Learn Direct continues to be very succcessful. |
· Joint Tender with Bristol for medium term may offer some savings · Difficult negotiations with Shanks ongoing to obtain Council's equitable share. May need direct representations to Government to unlock · Maintain success in securing future credits · Develop further resource streams that allow response to workload · Close scrutiny of cost base an recovery plan being prepared · Opportunity to reinvest in technology to maintain market edge |
· Waste Services Manager · Waste Services Manager · New HoS · David Davies · Bill Cotton · Bill Cotton |
||
Process |
· RDA procedures, timescales and decisions are impacting on all projects with RDA involvement. · Extent of delegation of Planning Decisions to officers requires review of existing scheme to achieve new BVPI target of 90% · District Audit Strategy into Development Control Committees completed. · Method Statements required for Waste Enforcement from Direct Services |
· Discussions with Board Members to unlock specific issues and wider generic issues · Report to Development Control Committee · Report to be considered by Development Control with specific regard to extent of site visits and delegation · Need to clarify processes and have transparent reporting arrangement. |
· Strategic Director · David Davies · David Davies · Matthew Smith |
3. RESULTS AGAINST PERFORMANCE TARGETS (Local Performance Plan & Council Strategy)
Summary of Performance
Performance Targets |
No. |
% |
RED |
5 |
10 |
AMBER |
14 |
27 |
GREEN |
27 |
53 |
NOT KNOWN |
5 |
10 |
TOTAL |
51 |
100 |
ECS
Scope of Reporting Area: Environmental & Consumer Services delivers a range of core unitary authority functions namely environmental health, trading standards, building control, licensing, land charges and systems management (including closed circuit television). |
Planning
Scope of Reporting Area: Planning Services is now structured into two principal groups, under two third tier managers. These are Development Control and Policy and Projects. Development Control deals with applications for development, advertisement, Listed Building and Conservation Consent. It is also responsible for appeals and enforcement. Policy and Projects are responsible for the preparation of the Development Plan (Local and Structure Plan), the World Heritage Site Management Plan and Supplementary Planning Guidance. The teams are also concerned with landscape design, matters relating to trees, nature conservation, countryside management, the management of Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, and the management of information polices and projects relating to the historic natural and built environment.
Sustainability and Economic Development
Scope of the reporting; Sustainability, Economic Development, Tourism and local partnerships which includes regeneration, partnership working and Training Services.
Waste
Scope of Reporting Area: Waste Services is part of the Transportation, Access and Waste Management Service area. Responsibilities are as follows: Responsible for policy and strategy relating to waste management throughout the district. Discharging legal responsibilities as both a Waste Collection and Waste Disposal Authority. Responsible for the operation of the Household Waste & Recycling Centres, Transfer Stations, Railhead and Recycling Schemes. Responsible for waste awareness campaigns and waste education in schools and the community. Responsible for the strategic management of the refuse collection and street cleansing contracts. Responsible for the policy and strategy relating to the provision of public conveniences. |
Ref. |
Indicator |
Top 25% |
2000/01 Actual |
2001/02 Estimate/Actual |
2002/3 Target |
Current |
2002/03 Estimated Outturn |
Status |
Comment |
156 |
Percentage of Authority's buildings open to the public in which all public areas are suitable for and accessible to disabled people |
12.8% |
12.8% |
15% |
12.8% |
15% |
Green |
||
Local15 |
Percentage local unemployment below national unemployment |
2.0% |
2.1% |
2.2% |
2.0% |
2% |
Red |
Local unemployment unlikely to reduce further as national figures reduces |
|
Local16 |
Long term unemployment as a percentage of total unemployment |
38% |
37% |
36% |
24% |
28% |
Green |
||
Local17 |
Reduction in unemployment in key wards in B&NES |
4.1% |
3.5% |
4.1% |
3.8% |
Red |
|||
Local18 |
Numbers of existing businesses advised |
320 |
320 |
350 |
68 |
350 |
Amber |
126 advice sessions delivered to these 68 companies |
|
Local19 |
Number of potential new businesses provided with training |
215 |
140 |
160 |
33 |
160 |
Amber |
||
Local20 |
Number of new business starts as a percentage of potential new business trained |
45% |
41% |
45% |
73% |
45% |
Green |
||
Local21 |
Average annual room occupancy in hotels and guest houses |
60% |
63% |
65% |
63% |
65% |
Green |
||
Local22 |
Avrage lenth of stay in hotels and gueasthouses [nights] |
1.8 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
Green |
||
Local23 |
Tourism web-site users [www.visitbath.co.uk] (000s) |
166 |
250 |
72 |
288 |
Green |
|||
82a |
Percentage of household waste recycled |
14% |
16% |
18% |
22% |
19% |
22% |
Green |
DEFRA funded projects will increase recycling rate - dealy in receiving funding. |
82b |
Percentage composted |
4.2% |
5% |
6% |
8% |
5.0% |
5% |
Green |
Organic waste collection trials will increase amount composted - but target may not be achieved due to late introduction of trials. Will have a clearer picture next quarter |
Ref. |
Indicator |
Top 25% |
2000/01 Actual |
2001/02 Estimate/Actual |
2002/3 Target |
Current |
2002/03 Estimated Outturn |
Status |
Comment |
82c |
Percentage used to recover heat, power and other energy sources |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0 |
Green |
|
82d |
Percentage landfilled |
79% |
79% |
77% |
70% |
76 |
Green |
Relates to 82a and 82b above |
|
84 |
Number of kilograms of household waste collected per head |
466kg |
486kg |
486kg |
486kg |
492kg |
492kg |
Amber |
|
85 |
Cost per square kilometre of keeping relevant land, for which the local authority is responsible, clear of litter and refuse |
£36180 |
£102437 |
£102437 |
£102437 |
NK |
Indicator now deleted as National Target |
||
86 |
Cost of waste collection per household |
£25.66 |
£24.06 |
£24.00 |
£23.50 |
£36.00 |
Green |
Figure now includes cost of recycling collections |
|
87 |
Cost of waste disposal per tonne for municipal waste |
£27.17 |
£50.30 |
£47.00 |
£48.00 |
£49.00 |
Amber |
Target needs to be revised. Landfill tax increase of £1 per tonne. Target was set before year end figure finalised. £50.95 realistic |
|
88 |
Number of collections missed per 100,000 collections of household waste |
28 |
172 |
116 |
120 |
146 |
Red |
Official figures include missed recycling boxes for 2001/02. Indicator deleted in 2002/03 but will be retained by B&NES as a local indicator for missed refuse collection. Target 92 per 100,000 |
|
89 |
Percentage of people satisfied with cleanliness standards |
71% |
67% |
Top 25% |
68% |
NK |
DETR Satisfaction surveys carried out in 2001/02 only. |
||
Local24 |
Street Cleanliness standards [Tidy Britain Group's CIMS index] |
N/a |
71% |
81% |
82% |
82% |
Green |
Annual survey due in September |
|
90a |
Percentage expressing satisfaction with household refuse collection |
90% |
80% |
Not measured |
Top25% |
NK |
DETR Satisfaction surveys carried out in 2001/02 only. |
||
90b |
Percentage expressing satisfaction with recycling facilities |
73% |
77% |
Not measured |
Top25% |
NK |
DETR Satisfaction surveys carried out in 2001/02 only. |
||
Ref. |
Indicator |
Top 25% |
2000/01 Actual |
2001/02 Estimate/Actual |
2002/3 Target |
Current |
2002/03 Estimated Outturn |
Status |
Comment |
90c |
Percentage expressing satisfaction with waste & recycling centres |
77% |
77% |
Top25% |
NK |
DETR Satisfaction surveys carried out in 2001/02 only. |
|||
91 |
Percentage of population served by a kerbside collection of recyclables or within 1 kilometre of a recycling centre |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Green |
|
178 |
Percentage of the total length of footpaths and other rights of way that were easy to use by members of the public |
93% |
70% |
73% |
77% |
Amber |
Dependent on Survey to be delivered |
||
106 |
Percentage of new homes built on previously developed land |
84% |
63% |
74% (target in Performance Plan 44%) |
55% |
It is too early in the year to have any meaningful data |
55% |
Green |
This is now a National PSA target - 60%. A recent detailed Urban Capacity Study indicates that up to 2011 the average is likely to be 55%. No more can be achieved as it is a finite resource. The figure for each year will vary according to what proposals come forward. |
107 |
Planning cost per head of population |
£7.46 |
£17.40 |
£17.14 |
£17.14 |
£17.23 |
Less thank £17.14 (based on 2001/2 estimate) |
Green |
|
108 |
Number of advertised departures from the statutory plan approved by the authority as a percentage of total permissions granted |
0.07% |
0.15% |
< 0.102% |
< 0.2% |
N/A |
0.102% |
Green |
It is too early in the year to have any meaningful data. |
109 |
Percentage of applications determined within 8 weeks |
71% |
54% |
65% |
68% |
70% |
Green |
The first quarter figure was 70% which is in excess of target |
|
109a |
Percentage within 13 weeks - major developments [10+ dwellings or larger than 1 hectare] |
N/a |
7% |
27% |
45% |
30% |
Red |
The major applications category is a problem to attain due to local circumstances well above target in other categories |
|
Ref. |
Indicator |
Top 25% |
2000/01 Actual |
2001/02 Estimate/Actual |
2002/3 Target |
Current |
2002/03 Estimated Outturn |
Status |
Comment |
109b |
Percentage within 8 weeks - minor developments [less than above] |
49% |
59% |
55% |
71% |
60% |
Green |
||
109c |
Percentage within 8 weeks - other [householders, change of use etc] |
55% |
67% |
66% |
71% |
70% |
Green |
||
111 |
Percentage of applicants and those commenting on planning applications satisfied with the service received |
84% |
63% |
No survey |
+10% |
No survey results currently available from applicants. Customer satisfaction high for Development Team and callers to reception |
Green |
Survey to be carried out later this year |
|
112 |
Score against a checklist of planning best practice |
70% |
44% |
80% |
78% |
80% |
Green |
Recent initiatives have raised the score significantly |
|
Local31 |
Percentage of valid registrations registered within 3 working days |
85% |
100% |
Est. 84% |
Amber |
||||
Local32 |
Percentage of neighbours identified at registration notified within 2 days of registration |
95% |
100% |
Est. 96% |
Amber |
||||
Local33 |
Percentage of written enforcement complaints acknowledged within 5 working days |
92% |
100% |
Est. 93% |
Amber |
||||
Local34 |
Percentage of sites subject to enforcement inspection visited within 5 working days |
98% |
100% |
Est. 98% |
Amber |
||||
179 |
Percentage of standard searches carried out in 10 working days |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Green |
|
166 |
Score against a checklist of enforcement best practice for environmental health/trading standards |
8 |
8 |
7 |
7 |
Amber |
|||
Local37 |
Percentage of environmental health, trading standards and licensing customers rating service as good, very good or excellent |
91% |
95% |
92% |
90% |
92% |
Green |
||
Local38 |
Percentage of Building Regulations Applications appraised within 3 weeks |
94% |
93% |
93% |
91% |
93% |
Green |
||
Ref. |
Indicator |
Top 25% |
2000/01 Actual |
2001/02 Estimate/Actual |
2002/3 Target |
Current |
2002/03 Estimated Outturn |
Status |
Comment |
p17 |
Adopt a waste strategy with stringent recycling targets in order to aspire to our long-term vision |
Do It |
Amber |
||||||
p17 |
Trial kerbside collections of organic waste (food waste, garden waste and cardboard) for composting |
Do It |
Green |
||||||
p17 |
Implement a comprehensive Waste Awareness Campaign in partnership with Avon Friends of the Earth, using external funding allocated by waste management companies |
Do It |
Green |
||||||
p22 |
Extend the Shopmobility service to other towns outside Bath |
Do It |
Red |
Dependant on sponsorship funding - not now available until 2003/4 |
|||||
p22 |
Develop a strategic plan under the Market & Coastal Towns Initiative. This Plan will be reviewed annually by a partnership established to carry forward the initiative in Midsomer Norton, Radstock and their surrounding communities, fourteen in all |
Do It |
First stage consultation complete |
Action Plan and Partnership |
Amber |
||||
p22 |
The Bath Communities Partnership is seeking external funding to help improve the situation of Bath's Black & Other Minority Ethnic communities, and of residents of the most deprived neighbourhoods in the City, with initial priority given to the Twerton/Southdown area |
Do It |
RDA application (£1.5M) - decision pending |
Amber |
|||||
p26 |
Develop and publish an economic development vision and act on the priorities identified in the consultation |
Do It |
Vision published |
Done |
Green |
||||
p26 |
Open the UK's first natural hot spring Spa with the development of the three Spa sites through an innovative partnership venture to revitalise the UK's Spa culture |
Do It |
Green |
||||||
P26 |
Introduce a Modern Apprenticeship partnership with City of Bath College to help improve the skill base and development of staff |
Do it |
Amber |
Feasibility under discussion with City of Bath College |
3. Key Performance Indicators See monthly report graphs for quarterly comparisons
4. Analysis of Complaints (received in previous 6 months) WasteNo complaints received |
Planning
No complaints received
SEDTLP
No complaints received
ECS |
|||||
Ref |
Nature of Complaint |
Date Received |
Date Resolved |
Comment/Subsequent Change to Procedures? |
|
ECS/ CC1 |
Charging of management fee for drainage works carried out in default |
15/09/01 |
29/04/02 |
First and second stage investigation determined complaint unfounded; now subject of Ombudsman complaint. |