Meeting documents

Cabinet
Wednesday, 1st December, 2004

Bath & North East Somerset Council

MEETING:

Council Executive

PAPER
NUMBER

 

DATE:

December 2004

   

TITLE:

School Pupil Performance

EXECUTIVE

FORWARD

PLAN REF:

E696

WARD:

All

AN OPEN PUBLIC ITEM

List of attachments to this report:

None

1 THE ISSUE

1.1 The results of the pupil and so school performance in the public tests and examinations were improved in almost all areas in 2004. It can be considered as the best set of results to date. The Local Authority has a statutory duty to raise standards and improve schools. A significant part of its performance is measured by those of its schools which are reflected in the Comprehensive Performance Assessment (CPA) rating.

2 RECOMMENDATION

The Council Executive is asked to:

2.1 Receive the results for 2004 in response to the Local Authority's statutory duty to raise standards of pupil performance and to improve schools.

2.2 Pay due regard to its duties and these results when making decisions about the development of its Education and other relevant services.

2.3 Publicly commend pupils, teachers, schools and LEA officers on the 2004 results

3

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

3.1 There are no financial implications resulting directly from this report.

3.2 The Executive is asked to keep to the fore the Local Authority's statutory responsibilities to raise standards and improve schools when making financial and budgetary decisions.

4 THE REPORT

The LEA was commended highly by Department for Education and Skills (DfES) officers at a recent review meeting, for being high performing and successful. It was described as being at the leading edge of school improvement, with particularly rich and detailed data analysis which is being used effectively at school and LEA levels. The data analysis provided for schools in Bath & North East Somerset is to be used nationally for training purposes as part of the National Strategies to raise standards. This is a high accolade.

4.1 Key Stage 1

4.1.1 At the end of Key Stage 1 the performance of pupils age 7 years is measured by Standards Assessment Tasks (SATs) and teacher assessment. The SATs are marked by their teachers and moderated and audited by the LEA. These results are not published and schools are not required to set targets for Key Stage 1 SATs. Teacher assessment will become the main assessment process for 7 year olds from 2005.

Level 2 or more: (Level 2 is the expected benchmark for 7 year olds)

Figures in brackets are for 2003

 

B&NES

% of Pupils

National

% of Pupils

LEA Rank

Reading

87 (88)

85 (84)

33

Writing

85 (86)

82 (82)

30

Maths

93 (93)

90 (91)

20

Level 2B or more*

Figures in brackets are for 2003

 

B&NES

% of Pupils

National

% of Pupils

LEA Rank

(150 LEAs)

Reading

75 (73)

70 (69)

20

Writing

67 (67)

62 (62)

13

Maths

80 (78)

76 (74)

14

*Level 2B: The scores gained in the tests are converted in to the levels. Level 2 has a wide band of scores. To help schools and parents understand the pupils' attainment this particular level is subdivided into three: 2A is the highest, 2B in the middle and 2C the lowest. None of the other levels are subdivided officially.

4.1.2 The results, although varying slightly from year to year have always been consistently above the national average. Results at Key Stage 1 are compressed nationally. Level 2B or more is more demanding and provides pupils with a more secure level of achievement.

4.1.3 There is some underachievement at Key Stage 1 indicated by a slight trend downwards over the last three years.

4.2 Key Stage 2

4.2.1 The SATs for pupils at the end of Key Stage 2 (11 year olds) are published school by school and have to be made readily available to the public, unless there are less than 10 children in the year group. The governing body of each school with Key Stage 2 pupils have to set targets for Level 4 and Level 5.

4.2.2 Level 4 is the expected benchmark for Key Stage 2 pupils. It is judged that pupils need Level 4 in English particularly but also in mathematics in order to be able to access the secondary school curriculum. Key Stage 2 results are one of the most accurate predictors for individual pupil performance at GCSE (16 years of age).

4.2.3 Data for 2004 is still provisional awaiting national confirmation from the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA).

Key Stage 2 Level 4 or more: (Level 4 is the expected benchmark for 11 year olds)

Figures in brackets are for 2003

 

B&NES

% of Pupils

National

% of Pupils

Max % in any LEA

Min % in any LEA

LEA Rank

(150 LEAs)

English

81 (79)

77 (75)

86

67

23

Maths

80 (77)

73 (73)

85

64

7

Science

89 (90)

85 (87)

97

75

13

2004 was the first time that over 80% of 11 year old pupils gained Level 4 or more in English and mathematics in Bath & North East Somerset. This is a particularly pleasing result.

4.2.4 David Miliband, Minister for School Standards, has written to congratulate the LEA and its primary schools for being one of the most improved in the country. The results for eleven year olds, improved in 2004 by almost twice the national average and are within the top 15% of all LEAs.

4.2.5 The highly aspirational targets for the LEA were 88% Level 4 for both English and mathematics. There are no targets for science. The aggregation of the individual school pupil targets was 81.8% for English and 83.6% for mathematics. The outcome was close to the schools' aspirations.

4.2.6 There is a wide range of school performance. Some schools have excellent outcomes at the upper end, including 9 in English and 6 in mathematics with 100%. There are 19 schools with under 80% in English (of which 9 are below 66%) and 23 in maths (7 below 66%). There is a national target that all schools should exceed 65% in both subjects. It is not unreasonable that there should be no schools below 80% in Bath & North East Somerset and that 90% of pupils in Bath & North East Somerset should achieve Level 4 in English and mathematics, even though this is challenging.

The number of schools falling in each band:

Level 4

100%

99% - 90%

89% - 80%

79% - 66%

Below 66%

English

9

11

16

10

9

Mathematics

6

10

16

16

7

4.2.7 There was no gender difference in the 2004 results for mathematics. However, there was a 9 percentage point gap in English. In reading it was 7 percentage points and in writing 15 percentage points. There have been some improvements in the performance of boys. Conversely there are indications that the girls are improving at a slower rate than those in other LEAs. Even so, boys, especially their writing, continue to be an area of concern in this LEA.

4.2.8 Although Level 5 in the expected benchmark for Key Stage 3 pupils at 14 years of age, many 11 year olds also achieve it. Primary Schools are required to set Level 5 targets.

4.2.9 The Level 5 results in Bath & North East Somerset continue to improve and are also very creditable. However, they are made up of a similarly wide distribution of individual school results.

Key Stage 2 Level 5

Figures in brackets are for 2003

 

B&NES

% of Pupils

National

% of Pupils

Max % in any LEA

Min % in any LEA

LEA Rank

(150 LEAs)

English

31 (31)

26 (26)

37

17

14

Maths

37 (32)

30 (28)

43

19

11

Science

50 (44)

42 (40)

67

26

9

4.3 Key Stage 3

4.3.1 The SATs for pupils at the end of Key Stage 3 (14year olds) are also published school by school and have to be made readily available to the public. The governing body of each school with Key Stage 3 pupils have to set targets for Level 5. Level 5 is the national expectation for 14 year olds. It is unlikely that pupils without Level 5 will gain good GCSE passes.

4.3.2 Key Stage 3 SATs now have a more important role in measuring school performance. The National Key Stage 3 Strategy has seen significant improvements nationally and locally. All schools in Bath & North East Somerset have responded positively to the strategy and played their part in implementing it to the benefit of their pupils.

4.3.3 Data for 2004 is still provisional awaiting national confirmation from the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). The English results have been the subject of considerable challenge nationally with a large number of papers returned fro remarking. There is still no data nationally so the table is incomplete for English.

Key Stage 3 Level 5

Figures in brackets are for 2003

 

B&NES

% of Pupils

National

% of Pupils

Max % in any LEA

Min % in any LEA

LEA Rank

(150 LEAs)

English

78 (76)

See 4.3.3

See 4.3.3

See 4.3.3

See 4.3.3

Maths

79 (78)

73 (71)

91

56

12

Science

76 (76)

66 (69)

91

45

7

4.3.4 Results in mathematics and science, although below the aspirational target set locally, continue to improve steadily. This LEA was one of only seven LEAs in the country to improve on the 2003 result in science. The English result is also the best ever. In the past it has been variable, so it is too early to say that continual improvement is secure.

4.3.5 Overall these results, which are above the national averages and compare very favourably with other LEAs, are pleasing and a credit to the pupils and their teachers. However, there is a wide spread of results between the schools. The LEA's challenging targets were not achieved by about 4 percentage points. There is significant room for further improvement.

4.3.6 The results at Level 6 are above national average and compare favourably with other LEAs. The result for mathematics was the only one to improve on the previous year.

Key Stage 3 Level 6

Figures in brackets are for 2003

 

B&NES

% of Pupils

National

% of Pupils

Max % in any LEA

Min % in any LEA

LEA Rank

(150 LEAs)

English

40 (46)

See 4.3.3

See 4.3.3

See 4.3.3

See 4.3.3

Maths

60 (58)

52 (49)

67

34

14

Science

43 (52)

34 (40)

61

17

12

4.4 Key Stage 4

4.4.1 The GCSE results for pupils age 16 years have long been the key measure of secondary school performance. The Governing Body have to set targets for GCSE and the results are published. 2004 saw the introduction of a new way of calculating average point scores so there are no comparisons from the previous year.

4.4.2 Vocational GCSEs are not so wide spread and are less well developed in this LEA compared to many others. The development of a 14-19 strategy will help address this.

Key Stage 4 GCSE

Figures in brackets are for 2003

 

B&NES

% of Pupils

National

% of Pupils

Max % in any LEA

Min % in any LEA

LEA Rank

(150 LEAs)

5+ A* - C

60.1 (60)

51.5 (51.1)

92.9

34.1

16

5+ A* - G

92.1 (92)

89.4 (89.4)

96.4

76.3

22

1+ A* - G

97.1 (96.1)

96 (95.0)

98.9

89.4

23

Av Points score

360.1

 

471* (389)

263.1

21

* Isles of Scilly - figure in brackets is the next highest LEA)

4.4.3 There was a marginal increase in all measures in 2004. The results are well above the national averages and compare very favourably with other LEAs. Although the measure of one or more A* - G is has been replaced by five or more nationally, it is still important to know how many pupils leave school with no qualifications and so is a useful test of inclusivity.

4.4.4 The result for 5 or more A* - C was below the target of 64% for the LEA and the aggregation of school targets.

4.4.5 As in other Key Stages there is a wide spread of school performance within these results. Even so there has been improvement in most of the lower performing schools and no school is below the national floor target. Some of the highest performing schools had slightly lower results which balanced the gains made by the lower schools.

4.5 Post Sixteen (Sixth form)

4.5.1 Post 16 provision is non-statutory and funded through the local Learning and Skills Council (LSC). Results are published nationally but there is no requirement for the governing body to set targets. Schools in Bath & North East Somerset have agreed to do so voluntarily.

Post 16 `A' Level

Figures in brackets are for 2003

Average Points per

B&NES

% of Pupils

National

% of Pupils

Max % in any LEA

Min % in any LEA

LEA Rank

(150 LEAs)

Pupil

248.7 (232.0)

252.9 (245.3)

319.9

142.9

74

Entry

80.2 ( 76.9)

75.5 ( 75.5)

86.7

56.6

19

4.5.2 The average points per entry have improved and are above the national average, comparing favourably with other LEAs. However, that for individual students is below the national average and a cause for significant concern. It does not reflect the strength of school performance at all other Key Stages and raises questions about the appropriateness and effectiveness of the provision made by schools and about the expectations they have of their students.

4.5.3 The LEA is working closely with and is supported by the LSC in endeavouring to address these concerns. A small team of an adviser, consultant and data analyst are enabling the LEA and individual schools to challenge and reflect on the provision, expectations and outcomes. The continuing development of the 14-19 Strategy and implementation of the Strategic Area Review are crucial.

4.6 Pupils in Public Care (Looked after Children)

4.6.1 The Local Authority has specific legal responsibilities as the corporate parent of children in public care, who may be regarded as a vulnerable group.

4.6.2 The numbers are low and so must be analysed individually by comparing with the performance of similar pupils. Overall half of the pupils at Key Stage 2 and three quarters at Key Stage 4 are in the lowest quartile. Results for those out of the LEA are being pursued.

Looked After Children Performance Summary 2004

KS2 2004

No. of pupils

% Achieving Level 4 or Above

Value Added Performance

(compared to pupils with similar prior attainment in LEA)

 

Reading

Writing

English

Maths

 

English

Pupils

Maths

Pupils

In LEA

8

63%

25%

63%

50%

Top 25%

1

0

         

Similar

3

3

         

Bottom 25%

3

4

         

Absent

1

1

Out of LEA

2

Awaiting further information

All pupils

(LEA)

1794

86%

69%

81%

80%

 

KS4 2004

No. of pupils

% 5+ A*-C

% 5+ A*-G

Av. Score per Pupil

Value Added Performance

(compared to pupils with similar prior attainment nationally)

         

Total points

Pupils

English

Pupils

Maths

Pupils

In LEA

5

0%

60.0%

19.2

Top 25%

0

1

0

       

Similar

1

0

1

       

Bottom 25%

3

3

3

       

No prior attainment

1

1

1

Out of LEA

7

Awaiting further information

All pupils

(LEA)

2166

60.1%

92.1%

44.3

 

4.7 Other areas to measure a school

4.7.1 Whilst pupil performance is a crucial measure of school success, standards also include the levels of attendance and the quality of pupil behaviour. All three can be regarded is inextricably linked.

4.7.2 More widely, schools should be considered in the light of the success of the provision they make for the diversity of their pupils and the community they serve. Measures of inclusion are more difficult to determine. Bath & North East Somerset is in the process of developing an Inclusion Chart Mark.

4.7.3 The Green Paper, "Every Child Matters" and the Children Bill have identified five outcomes. In the future pupil performance will be judged in the light of these:

96 being healthy

96 staying safe

96 enjoying and achieving

96 making a positive contribution

96 economic well-being

5 RISK MANAGEMENT

A risk assessment related to the issue and recommendations has been undertaken, in compliance with the Council's decision making risk management guidance.

6 RATIONALE

6.1 The Local Authority has a statutory duty to raise standards and to improve its schools. It must pay due regard to this in all its decisions.

7 OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED

7.1 None relevant

8 CONSULTATION

8.1 Recognised Teachers Professional Associations received a presentation and were enabled to comment and ask questions

8.2 The Overview and Scrutiny Panel for Lifelong Learning and the Governors' Forum have both received a short presentation

8.3 Headteachers received an overview at their termly meeting with the Education Director.

8.4 DfES officers discussed the results with the LEA during the annual Stocktake.

Contact person

Richard Brock, Head of Service, School Improvement

01225 395150

Background papers

None