Issue - meetings

There is an exempt appendix to this open report. It is likely that the Panel will need to move into private session at some stage if the Panel wish to discuss the content of the exempt appendix. In which case the following resolution will need to be passed:

“that having been satisfied that the public interest would be better served by not disclosing relevant information, in accordance with the provisions of Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following item(s) of business and the reporting of the meeting be prevented under Section 100A(5A) because of the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act, as amended.”

Note: Councillor Hughes (attending as a ward Councillor and tenant of Wansdyke Business Centre to make a public statement) left the meeting on advice from the legal advisor.

Councillor Blackburn – Lead Call in Member

Councillor Blackburn made a statement explaining the reasons for the call in (a copy is attached to these minutes)

Panel members asked the following questions and raised the following points:

In response to a question from Councillor Singleton, Councillor Blackburn stated that he has tried to identify companies who have shown an interest in the building, he added that the Council website states that the building is ‘temporary closed’.

Councillor Duguid asked if the building would need to be refurbished. Councillor Blackburn stated that he had visited one office and in his view, it was comparable to similar office space around the country and he genuinely believes there are people who would want to rent there.

Councillor Warrington asked that, if kept as it is with the same charges, would there be a saving for the Council. Councillor Blackburn stated that he had not seen the figures and that this has not been explored as there was not scrutiny of the decision.

Councillor MacFie asked if option 3 is what is being asked for by the Call in members (to return the centre to the open market). Councillor Blackburn explained that someone could then turn it into industrial space so office space could be lost. He did not believe the best option is the return to the open market.

Councillor Elliott asked if there is market failure. Councillor Blackburn stated that he believes this business has been failed as there has been no attempt to engage with prospective tenants. It appears the Council want to run it down and pass it on.

Councillor Elliott asked about finding another operator. Councillor Blackburn stated that the Council have failed, it has slipped away under our management.

Councillor MacFie asked if we could pass it on but keep it as it is (office space). Councillor Blackburn stated that this was a nice idea but that decisions would be taken on data and facts but this could be a viable way of looking at it.

Councillor Davies – Cabinet Member for Council House Building (representing the Cabinet Member for Economic Development and Resources)

Councillor Davies made a statement regarding the decision.

Panel members asked the following questions and raised the following points:

Councillor McCabe referred to the accusation that the site had been managed down and asked if there was any data on approaches. The Cabinet Member stated that nobody has approached the Council. He further explained that the unit had always required a subsidy and that this was not due to the Council’s management. He explained that the subsidy had been absolutely appropriate given the market circumstances at the time but not now.

Councillor Duguid stated that a point in the call in statement said that nobody was taken in, was this deliberate. The Cabinet Member explained that  ...  view the full minutes text for item 73