Appendix A

SUMMARY BUDGET FORECASTS

  1. The indicative summary budget forecasts shown below reflect the anticipated costs that have been identified to date for the JRMWMS and JWPD projects.  In respect of the Joint Procurement exercise, some broad cost estimates have also been included to give an indication of the scale of costs that may potentially arise. These costs will be finalised in the Service plan for 07/08.

 

  1. The Project Board has recommended that costs of the project be shared equally amongst the UAs during the Strategy and Joint Waste Development Plan process, and apportioned on the basis of residual waste arisings in each authority during the procurement process based on annual returns submitted under the statutory reporting database, WasteDataFlow.   

 

INDICATIVE SUMMARY BUDGET FORECASTS AS AT 24/11/06

 

Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

2008/09

2009/10

2010/11

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy

36,500

289,000

239,250

 

 

 

564,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joint Development Plan Document

 

194,200

308,000

160,000

389,300

 

1,051,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joint Waste Procurement

 

 

200,000

1,350,000

907,500

540,500

2,998,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year totals

36,500

483,200

747,250

1,510,000

1,296,800

540,500

4,614,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apportionment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B&NES

9,125

120,800

168,813

256,000

242,525

86,480

883,743

BCC

9,125

120,800

216,813

580,000

460,325

216,200

1,603,263

SGC

9,125

120,800

180,813

337,000

296,975

118,910

1,063,623

NSC

9,125

120,800

180,813

337,000

296,975

118,910

1,063,623

 

36,500

483,200

747,250

1,510,000

1,296,800

540,500

4,614,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note:  Joint Waste Procurement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated process costs only -  from GLA report (PPP route)

Detail and profile to be worked up through PID and Planning process

 

in conjunction with 4ps, Jacobs Babtie and Capita-Symonds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COST APPORTIONMENT

 

The following is an extract of the minutes from the member project board meeting 26th September 2006:

 

 

 

Note:  Cost Apportionment Recommendations (Member Project Board 26th September)

 

 

 

(i)                                  Since the production of the Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy and the Waste Development Plan Document have equal benefit to all four partnering UAs, the apportionment during the time when these documents are being prepared should remain on an equal four way split.

 

(ii)                                At the point at which the process of procurement commences, the apportionment be adjusted, based on the quantity of Directly Landfilled Municipal Waste to better represent the nature of the task ahead and to reflect the efforts each authority is taking to reduce the volumes of residual waste and to provide an incentive to do so.

 

To be agreed on the basis that there will be an annual review of the percentage apportionment by Directly Landfilled Waste, with a retrospective adjustment based on the actual audited WasteDataFlow (WDF) figures from the Environment Agency.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table to illustrate indicative percentage apportionment, based on 2005/06 WDF data

 

 

 

Authority

Directly Landfilled MSW (tonnes, 2005/06)

Apport-ionment

 

 

 

 

 

B&NES

63,409

16%

 

 

 

 

 

Bristol

153,439

40%

 

 

 

 

 

North Somerset

86,461

22%

 

 

 

 

 

South Gloucestershire

83,699

22%

 

 

 

 

 

Totals

387,008

100%